Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260461›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Effectiveness of educational interventions to develop patient safety knowledge, skills, behaviours and attitudes in undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review protocol.

Helena De Rezende, Aline Mirema F Vitorio, Alexandre Souza Morais, Ana Claudia A Garzin, Andressa Garcia Nicole, Ellen Regina Sevilla Quadrado, Daniela Campos de Andrade Lourenção, Maristela Santini Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Helena De RezendeSchool of Nursing, Kingston University and St George's University of London, Kingston upon Thames, UK h.derezende@sgul.kingston.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5689-1223
Aline Mirema F VitorioState Superintendence of the Ministry of Health in Goiás, Ministry of Health, Goiânia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1506-8214
Alexandre Souza MoraisDepartment of Health Sciences, Federal University of Espírito Santo, São Mateus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7833-7936
Ana Claudia A GarzinSchool of Nursing, São Camilo University Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5090-5508
Andressa Garcia NicoleDepartment of Health Sciences, Federal University of Espírito Santo, São Mateus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1791-0580
Ellen Regina Sevilla QuadradoQuality and Safety in Nursing and Health Services Research Group, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2554-7961
Daniela Campos de Andrade LourençãoSchool of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3050-0378
Maristela Santini MartinsSchool of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0730-3923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient safety is a healthcare discipline that aims to prevent and reduce patient harm, risks and errors during the provision of healthcare. Given the size of the nursing workforce in the healthcare system the inclusion of patient safety in the undergraduate nursing curriculum is necessary to enhance a safe culture in the daily work of their future careers. To this end, it is essential to apply effective teaching strategies to develop patient safety competencies. This review will aim to evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions in developing patient safety knowledge, skills, behaviours and attitudes in undergraduate nursing students within the existing topic areas of the WHO Multi-professional Patient Safety Curriculum Guide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The databases Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Education Research Complete, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, LILACS, Medes and Grey literature such as ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, DART-Europe, ProQuest Dissertations, CAPES thesis and dissertations, The Virginia Henderson Global e-Repository, Mednar and Thesis Canada will be searched from July 2011 to January 2022. Two independent reviewers will conduct the search, extract the data and assess the risk of bias for the included studies, using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute. The quality of the evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development and Evaluation methodology. Studies will be pooled in the meta-analysis. Alternatively, the findings will be presented in narrative form, including tables and figures, to aid in data presentation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study raises no ethical issues. The findings will be disseminated through presentations at professional conferences and publications in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021254965.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateStudents, NursingAttitudeCurriculumHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPatient SafetyReview Literature as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topiceducation & training (see medical education & training)health & safetymedical education & trainingquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35260461
PMCPMC8905990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.