ArticleBMJ open2022
Effect of epidural analgesia on cancer outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a single-centre cohort study in Taiwan.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sedated and unsedated gastroscopy has no influence on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Insights and progress on postoperative analgesia of radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the influence of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia (EA) on cancer recurrence and overall survival after surgery for gastric cancer. STUDY DESIGN AND
settingA retrospective study which involved patients with stage I-III gastric cancer undergoing curative resection in a medical centre from January 2012 to December 2017 and followed up until December 2019 through electronic medical chart review. Patient demographics, anaesthetic and surgical characteristics and pathologic features were also gathered. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The effects of EA on postoperative cancer recurrence and overall survival were evaluated using proportional hazards regression models with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted for sensitivity analysis as well.
resultsAmong the 413 patients with median follow-up of 38.5 months (IQR: 22.1-59.7), 66 (16.0%) received EA after gastric cancer surgery. EA was not associated with greater cancer recurrence (IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.13, p=0.102) or cancer specific (IPTW- adjusted HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.04, p=0.07) and all-cause mortality (IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.16, p=0.143) after gastric cancer resections. For sensitivity analysis, multivariable Cox regression analysis also generated non-significant EA effects on cancer recurrence and survival after surgery.
conclusionsThere was no significant association between EA and cancer recurrence or overall survival in patients with stage I-III gastric cancer receiving surgical resection of primary tumour. Prospective study should be considered to elucidate the relationship between EA and cancer outcomes after gastric cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.