Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260415›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2023

Effects of tall man lettering on the visual behaviour of critical care nurses while identifying syringe drug labels: a randomised in situ simulation.

Quentin Lohmeyer, Cornel Schiess, Pedro David Wendel Garcia, Heidi Petry, Eric Strauch, Andreas Dietsche, Reto A Schuepbach, Philipp K Buehler, Daniel A Hofmaenner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quentin LohmeyerDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3802-5329
Cornel SchiessDepartment of Nursing and Allied Health Care Professions, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7762-2081
Pedro David Wendel GarciaInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7775-3279
Heidi PetryDepartment of Nursing and Allied Health Care Professions, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5220-4273
Eric StrauchDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2305-7072
Andreas DietscheDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Reto A SchuepbachInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7058-4377
Philipp K BuehlerInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4690-9896
Daniel A HofmaennerInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland danielandrea.hofmaenner@usz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-9334-7753
University Hospital of Zurich · CHETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients in intensive care units are prone to the occurrence of medication errors. Look-alike, sound-alike drugs with similar drug names can lead to medication errors and therefore endanger patient safety. Capitalisation of distinct text parts in drug names might facilitate differentiation of medication labels. The aim of this study was to test whether the use of such 'tall man' lettering (TML) reduces the error rate and to examine effects on the visual attention of critical care nurses while identifying syringe labels.

methodsThis was a prospective, randomised in situ simulation conducted at the University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Under observation by eye tracking, 30 nurses were given 10 successive tasks involving the presentation of a drug name and its selection from a dedicated set of 10 labelled syringes that included look-alike and sound-alike drug names, half of which had TML-coded labels.Error rate as well as dwell time, fixation count, fixation duration and revisits were analysed using a linear mixed-effects model analysis to compare TML-coded with non-TML-coded labels.

resultsTML coding of syringe labels led to a significant decrease in the error rate (from 5.3% (8 of 150 in non-TML-coded sets) to 0.7% (1 of 150 in TML-coded sets), p<0.05). Eye tracking further showed that TML affects visual attention, resulting in longer dwell time (p<0.01), more and longer fixations (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) on the drug name as well as more frequent revisits (p<0.01) compared with non-TML-coded labels. Detailed analysis revealed that these effects were stronger for labels using TML in the mid-to-end position of the drug name.

conclusionsTML in drug names changes visual attention while identifying syringe labels and supports critical care nurses in preventing medication errors.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsSyringesCritical CareDrug LabelingHumansMalePatient SafetyProspective Studiesmedical error, measurement/epidemiologypatient safetysafety culture

Identifiers

PMID35260415
PMCPMC9811086
OpenAlexW4220690384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.