Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260182›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Improving outcomes among young adults with type 1 diabetes: the D1 Now pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.

Eimear C Morrissey, Molly Byrne, Bláthín Casey, Dympna Casey, Paddy Gillespie, Anna Hobbins, Michelle Lowry, Elizabeth McCarthy, John Newell, Davood Roshan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eimear C MorrisseyHealth Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. eimear.morrissey@nuigalway.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1452-6145
Molly ByrneHealth Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Bláthín CaseyHealth Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Dympna CaseySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Paddy GillespieHealth Economics & Policy Analysis Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Anna HobbinsHealth Economics & Policy Analysis Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Michelle LowrySchool of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Elizabeth McCarthyHealth Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
John NewellSchool of Mathematics, Statistics & Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Davood RoshanSchool of Mathematics, Statistics & Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Shikha SharmaHealth Economics & Policy Analysis Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
D1 Now Young Adult Panel
Sean F DinneenSchool of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

Health Research Board DIFA-2017-034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe D1 Now intervention is designed to improve outcomes in young adults living with type 1 diabetes. It consists of three components: an agenda-setting tool, an interactive messaging system and a support worker. The aim of the D1 Now pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) was to gather and analyse acceptability and feasibility data to allow (1) further refinement of the D1 Now intervention, and (2) determination of the feasibility of evaluating the D1 Now intervention in a future definitive RCT.

methodsA pilot cluster RCT with two intervention arms and a control arm was conducted over 12 months. Quantitative data collection was based on a core outcome set and took place at baseline and 12 months. Semi-structured interviews with participants took place at 6, 9 and 12 months. Fidelity and health economic costings were also assessed.

resultsFour diabetes centres and 57 young adults living with type 1 diabetes took part. 50% of eligible young adults were recruited and total loss to follow-up was 12%. Fidelity, as measured on a study delivery checklist, was good but there were three minor processes that were not delivered as intended in the protocol. Overall, the qualitative data demonstrated that the intervention was considered acceptable and feasible, though this differed across intervention components. The agenda-setting tool and support worker intervention components were acceptable to both young adults and staff, but views on the interactive messaging system were mixed.

conclusionsSome modifications are required to the D1 Now intervention components and research processes but with these in place progression to a definitive RCT is considered feasible.

trial registrationISRCTN (ref: ISRCTN74114336 ).

Indexed as

Behaviour changeFeasibilityPilot randomised controlled trialType 1 diabetesYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID35260182
PMCPMC8902268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.