Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260175›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2022

Accuracy of heparin-binding protein for the diagnosis of nosocomial meningitis and ventriculitis.

Yueyue Kong, Yi Ye, Jiawei Ma, Guangzhi Shi

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical value of heparin-binding protein in adult bacterial intracranial infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The potential role of heparin-binding protein in neonatal sepsis: research progress.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yueyue KongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yi YeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jiawei MaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Guangzhi ShiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. shiguangzhi@bjtth.org.ORCID 0000-0003-4189-5800
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals ZYLX202109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe sensitive and accurate diagnosis of nosocomial meningitis and ventriculitis is still a critical problem. This study was designed to explore the diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid heparin-binding protein (HBP) in nosocomial meningitis and ventriculitis in comparison with procalcitonin and lactate.

methodsIn this observational study, 323 suspected patients were enrolled, of which 42 participants were excluded because they could not be accurately grouped, 131 subjects who were eventually diagnosed with nosocomial meningitis or ventriculitis and 150 patients in whom infection was ultimately ruled out were included in the final analysis. The main results are expressed as medians (interquartile ranges). The Chi-squared test was used to compare the baseline characteristics. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for group and subgroup analyses. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to describe the diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers. Spearman's partial correlation was used to analyze associations between the biomarkers. Statistical significance was set when p value < 0.05.

resultsHBP achieved the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, which was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.98-1.00) compared with 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.96-0.99) for lactate and 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.62-0.75) for procalcitonin. With a cutoff level at 23 ng/mL, HBP achieved a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 98%. The levels of HBP presented no significant discrepancy between patients who received previous empiric anti-infective therapy and those who did not (p > 0.05). Higher concentrations of HBP were present in patients with positive microbiological findings (p < 0.05). Levels of HBP positively correlated with polymorphonuclear cell count (Spearman's rho = 0.68, p < 0.01), white blood cell count (Spearman's rho = 0.57, p < 0.01) and lactate (Spearman's rho = 0.34, p < 0.01).

conclusionsCerebrospinal fluid heparin-binding protein is a reliable auxiliary diagnostic marker that is preferable over lactate and procalcitonin in identifying nosocomial meningitis and ventriculitis, and it also contributes to solving the diagnostic difficulties caused by empiric antibiotherapy.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCerebral VentriculitisCross InfectionMeningitis, BacterialBiomarkersBlood ProteinsCarrier ProteinsHumansMembrane ProteinsProspective StudiesROC CurveAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesAZU1 protein, humanBiomarkersBlood ProteinsCarrier ProteinsMembrane ProteinsCerebrospinal fluidHeparin-binding proteinLactateProcalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID35260175
PMCPMC8903701
OpenAlexW4220891119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.