Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260170›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2022

Novel diagnostic tools for identifying cognitive impairment using olfactory-stimulated functional near-infrared spectroscopy: patient-level, single-group, diagnostic trial.

Jaewon Kim, Dong Keon Yon, Kyu Yeong Choi, Jang Jae Lee, Namwoo Kim, Kun Ho Lee, Jae Gwan Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jaewon Kim *Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Dong Keon Yon *Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1628-9948
Kyu Yeong ChoiGwangju Alzheimer's & Related Dementia Cohort Research Center, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Jang Jae LeeGwangju Alzheimer's & Related Dementia Cohort Research Center, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Namwoo KimDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kun Ho Lee *Gwangju Alzheimer's & Related Dementia Cohort Research Center, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. leekho@chosun.ac.kr.
Jae Gwan Kim *Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. jaekim@gist.ac.kr.
Chosun University · KRGwangju Institute of Science and Technology · KRSejong University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBasic studies suggest that olfactory dysfunction and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) can be used as tools for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI); however, real-world evidence is lacking. We investigated the potential diagnostic efficacy of olfactory-stimulated fNIRS for early detection of MCI and/or Alzheimer disease (AD).

methodsWe conducted a patient-level, single-group, diagnostic interventional trial involving elderly volunteers (age >60 years) suspected of declining cognitive function. Patients received open-label olfactory-stimulated fNIRS for measurement of oxygenation difference in the orbitofrontal cortex. All participants underwent amyloid PET, MRI, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB).

resultsOf 97 subjects, 28 (28.9%) were cognitively normal, 32 (33.0%) had preclinical AD, 21 (21.6%) had MCI, and 16 (16.5%) had AD. Olfactory-stimulated oxygenation differences in the orbitofrontal cortex were associated with cognitive impairment; the association was more pronounced with cognitive severity. Olfactory-stimulated oxygenation difference was associated with MMSE (adjusted β [aβ] 1.001; 95% CI 0.540-1.463), SNSB language and related function (aβ, 1.218; 95% CI, 0.020-2.417), SNSB memory (aβ, 1.963; 95% CI, 0.841-3.084), SNSB frontal/executive function (aβ, 1.715; 95% CI, 0.401-3.029) scores, standard uptake value ratio from amyloid PET (aβ, -10.083; 95% CI, -19.063 to -1.103), and hippocampal volume from MRI (aβ, 0.002; 95% CI, 0.001-0.004). Olfactory-stimulated oxygenation difference in the orbitofrontal cortex was superior in diagnosing MCI and AD (AUC, 0.909; 95% CI, 0.848-0.971), compared to amyloid PET (AUC, 0.793; 95% CI, 0.694-0.893) or MRI (AUC, 0.758; 95% CI, 0.644-0.871). DISCUSSION: Our trial showed that olfactory-stimulated oxygenation differences in the orbitofrontal cortex detected by fNIRS were associated with cognitive impairment and cognitive-related objectives. This novel approach may be a potential diagnostic tool for patients with MCI and/or AD.

trial registrationCRIS number, KCT0006197 .

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesHumansMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAlzheimer’s diseaseCognitive impairmentfNIRSMild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID35260170
PMCPMC8905807
OpenAlexW4220786069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.