Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260134›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Global measurement of intimate partner violence to monitor Sustainable Development Goal 5.

Kathryn M Yount, Yuk Fai Cheong, Zara Khan, Irina Bergenfeld, Nadine Kaslow, Cari Jo Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Decision-Making Framework for Selecting Intimate Partner Violence Measures in Health Research.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Violence against women and girls research: Leveraging gains across disciplines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathryn M YountHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, NE, Room 7029, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. kyount@emory.edu.
Yuk Fai CheongDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Zara KhanUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical School, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Irina BergenfeldHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, NE, Room 7029, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Nadine KaslowDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 12 Executive Park Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Cari Jo ClarkHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, NE, Room 7029, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Funding

Global Validation of Measures for Intimate Partner ViolenceR01HD099224 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, CARI JO, YOUNT, KATHRYN M · 2019 to 2021
$929k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne third of women experience intimate partner violence (IPV) and potential sequelae. Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 5.2-to eliminate violence against women, including IPV-compels states to monitor such violence. We conducted the first global measurement-invariance assessment of standardised item sets for IPV.

methodsDemographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 36 Lower-/Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) administering 18 IPV items during 2012-2018 were included. Analyses were performed separately for two items sets: lifetime physical IPV (seven items) and controlling behaviours (five items). We performed country-specific exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA/CFA). Datasets meeting benchmarks for acceptable item loadings and model-fit statistics were included in multiple-group CFA (MGCFA) to test for exact measurement invariance. Based on findings, alignment optimization (AO) was performed to assess approximate measurement invariance (< 25% of model parameters non-invariant). For each item set, national rankings based on AO-derived scores and on prevalence estimates were compared. AO-derived scores were correlated with type-specific IPV prevalences to assess correspondence.

resultsNational rates of physical IPV (5.6-50.5%) and controlling behavior (25.9-84.7%) varied. For each item set, item loadings and model-fit statistics were adequate in country-specific, unidimensional EFAs and CFAs. Both unidimensional constructs lacked exact invariance in MGCFA but achieved approximate invariance in AO analysis (12.3% of model parameters for physical IPV and 6.7% for controlling behaviour non-invariant). For both item sets, national rankings based on AO-derived scores were distributed similarly to rankings based on prevalence. However, estimates often were not significantly different cross-nationally, precluding national-level comparisons regardless of estimation strategy. Three physical-IPV items (slap, twist, choke) and two controlling-behaviour items (meet female friends; contact with family) warrant cognitive testing to improve their psychometric properties. Correlations of AO-derived scores for physical IPV (0.48-0.66) and controlling behaviours (0.49-0.87) with prevalences of lifetime physical, sexual, psychological IPV as well as controlling behaviour varied.

conclusionsSeven DHS lifetime physical-IPV items and five DHS controlling-behaviour items were approximately invariant across 36 LMICs spanning five world regions, such that cross-national comparisons of factor means are reasonable. Measurement-invariance testing over time will inform their utility to monitor SDG5.2.1; cross-national, cross-time measurement-invariance testing of improved sexual and psychological IPV item-sets is needed.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceSustainable DevelopmentFemaleHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersViolenceAlignment optimizationControlling behavioursCross-nationalMeasurement invariance testingPhysical intimate partner violenceSustainable development goal 5

Identifiers

PMID35260134
PMCPMC8903149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.