Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260131›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Cervical disc prostheses need a variable center of rotation for flexion / extension below disc level, plus a separate COR for lateral bending above disc level to more closely replicate in-vivo motion: MRI-based biomechanical in-vivo study.

Manfred K Muhlbauer, Ernst Tomasch, Wolfgang Sinz, Siegfried Trattnig, Hermann Steffan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From static X-rays to dynamic 3D tracking: A scoping review of cervical spine Imaging-Based motion assessment.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manfred K MuhlbauerNeurosurgical Department, Klinik Donaustadt, Langobardenstrasse 122, 1220, Vienna, Austria. manfred.muehlbauer@gesundheitsverbund.at.
Ernst TomaschVehicle Safety Institute, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Wolfgang SinzVehicle Safety Institute, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Siegfried TrattnigHigh Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hermann SteffanVehicle Safety Institute, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical disc prostheses are used to preserve motion after discectomy, but they should also provide a near-physiological qualitative motion pattern. Nevertheless, they come in many completely different biomechanical concepts. This caused us to perform an in-vivo MR-based biomechanical study to further investigate cervical spine motion with the aim to gain new information for improving the design of future cervical arthroplasty devices.

methodsFifteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI-investigation (in order to avoid radiation exposure) of their cervical spines from C3 to C7; for each segment centers of rotation (COR) for flexion / extension were determined from 5 different positions, and CORs for lateral bending from 3 different positions. The motion path of the COR is then described and illustrated in relation to the respective COR for maximum flexion / extension or lateral bending, respectively, and the findings are translated into implications for a better biomechanical prosthesis-design.

resultsThe COR for flexion / extension does not remain constant during motion. The CORs for the respective motion intervals were always found at different positions than the COR for maximum flexion /extension showing that the COR moves both along the x- and the y-axis throughout flexion / extension. For lateral bending a completely independent COR was found above disc-level.

conclusionFlexion / extension is not a simple circular motion. Disc prostheses need a variable COR for flexion / extension below disc level with the capability to move both along the x- and the y-axis during motion, plus a second completely independent COR for lateral bending above disc level to closely replicate in-vivo motion. These findings are important for improving the biomechanical design of such devices in the future.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeIntervertebral DiscBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, ArticularRotationCervical arthroplastyCervical disc prosthesesCervical spine biomechanicsIn-vivo kinematic study

Identifiers

PMID35260131
PMCPMC8905756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.