Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260106›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Cesarean delivery in Iran: a population-based analysis using the Robson classification system.

Maryam Pourshirazi, Mohammad Heidarzadeh, Mahshid Taheri, Habibollah Esmaily, Farah Babaey, Nasrin Talkhi, Leila Gholizadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Calendrical Caesarean Section; Iranian Model.Iranian journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  18. Analysis of Cesarean Section Ratios by Robson Classification.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maryam PourshiraziDepartment of Hospital Management and Clinical Services Excellence, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad HeidarzadehNeonatal Health Office, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran. heidarzadeh_2013@yahoo.com.
Mahshid TaheriDepartment of Hospital Management and Clinical Services Excellence, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Habibollah EsmailySocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Farah BabaeyDepartment of Hospital Management and Clinical Services Excellence, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Nasrin TalkhiDepartment of biostatistics, School of Health, Mashhad university of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Leila GholizadehFaculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rise of Cesarean Sections (CS) is a global concern. In Iran, the rate of CS increased from 40.7% in 2005 to 53% in 2014. This figure is even higher in the private sector.

objectiveTo analyze the CS rates in the last 2 years using the Robson Classification System in Iran.

methodsA retrospective analysis of all in-hospital electronically recorded deliveries in Iran was conducted using the Robson classification. Comparisons were made in terms of the type of hospital, CS rate, and obstetric population, and contributions of each group to the overall cesarean deliveries were reported.

resultsTwo million three hundred twenty-two thousand five hundred women gave birth, 53.6% delivered through CS. Robson group 5 was the largest contributing group to the overall number of cesarean deliveries (47.1%) at a CS rate of 98.4%. Group 2 and 1 ranked the second and third largest contributing groups to overall CSs (20.6 and 10.8%, respectively). The latter groups had CS rates much higher than the WHO recommendation of 67.2 and 33.1%, respectively. "Fetal Distress" and "Undefined Indications" were the most common reasons for cesarean deliveries at CS rates of 13.6 and 13.4%, respectively. There was a significant variation in CS rate among the three types of hospitals for Robson groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 10.

conclusionThe study revealed significant variations in CS rate by hospital peer-group, especially for the private maternity units, suggesting the need for further attention and audit of the Robson groups that significantly influence the overall CS rate. The study results will help policymakers identify effective strategies to reduce the CS rate in Iran, providing appropriate benchmarking to compare obstetric care with other countries that have better maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Hospitals, PrivateHospitals, PublicAdolescentAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansIranPopulation SurveillancePregnancyRegistriesRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAuditCesarean sectionIranRateRobson classificationTen-group

Identifiers

PMID35260106
PMCPMC8903666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.