Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260105›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2022

A deep learning framework for automated detection and quantitative assessment of liver trauma.

Negar Farzaneh, Erica B Stein, Reza Soroushmehr, Jonathan Gryak, Kayvan Najarian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The RSNA Abdominal Traumatic Injury CT (RATIC) Dataset.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Negar FarzanehDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. negarf@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1200-5274
Erica B SteinDepartment of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Reza SoroushmehrDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Jonathan GryakDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Kayvan NajarianDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
University of Michigan · USMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

Automated Decision Support System for Traumatic Brain Injury through Image Processing and Machine Learning ApproachesF31LM012946 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FARZANEH, NEGAR · 2019 to 2020
$69k
NLM NIH HHS F31 LM012946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth early detection and severity assessment of liver trauma are critical for optimal triage and management of trauma patients. Current trauma protocols utilize computed tomography (CT) assessment of injuries in a subjective and qualitative (v.s. quantitative) fashion, shortcomings which could both be addressed by automated computer-aided systems that are capable of generating real-time reproducible and quantitative information. This study outlines an end-to-end pipeline to calculate the percentage of the liver parenchyma disrupted by trauma, an important component of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) liver injury scale, the primary tool to assess liver trauma severity at CT.

methodsThis framework comprises deep convolutional neural networks that first generate initial masks of both liver parenchyma (including normal and affected liver) and regions affected by trauma using three dimensional contrast-enhanced CT scans. Next, during the post-processing step, human domain knowledge about the location and intensity distribution of liver trauma is integrated into the model to avoid false positive regions. After generating the liver parenchyma and trauma masks, the corresponding volumes are calculated. Liver parenchymal disruption is then computed as the volume of the liver parenchyma that is disrupted by trauma.

resultsThe proposed model was trained and validated on an internal dataset from the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) including 77 CT scans (34 with and 43 without liver parenchymal trauma). The Dice/recall/precision coefficients of the proposed segmentation models are 96.13/96.00/96.35% and 51.21/53.20/56.76%, respectively, in segmenting liver parenchyma and liver trauma regions. In volume-based severity analysis, the proposed model yields a linear regression relation of 0.95 in estimating the percentage of liver parenchyma disrupted by trauma. The model shows an accurate performance in avoiding false positives for patients without any liver parenchymal trauma. These results indicate that the model is generalizable on patients with pre-existing liver conditions, including fatty livers and congestive hepatopathy.

conclusionThe proposed algorithms are able to accurately segment the liver and the regions affected by trauma. This pipeline demonstrates an accurate performance in estimating the percentage of liver parenchyma that is affected by trauma. Such a system can aid critical care medical personnel by providing a reproducible quantitative assessment of liver trauma as an alternative to the sometimes subjective AAST grading system that is used currently.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray ComputedCT image processingDeep learningHematoma segmentationLiver disruption involvementLiver segmentationLiver trauma

Identifiers

PMID35260105
PMCPMC8905785
OpenAlexW4220723325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.