Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260091›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Perspectives on Telehealth for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic using the quadruple aim: interviews with 48 physicians.

Elizabeth M Goldberg, Michelle P Lin, Laura G Burke, Frances N Jiménez, Natalie M Davoodi, Roland C Merchant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth M GoldbergDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 55 Claverick Street, Second floor, Providence, RI, 02903, USA. Elizabeth_goldberg@brown.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1817-0705
Michelle P LinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Laura G BurkeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Frances N JiménezBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Natalie M DavoodiBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Roland C MerchantDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Brown University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

GAPcare II: The Geriatric Acute & Post-acute Care Coordination Program for Fall Prevention in the Emergency DepartmentK76AG059983 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GOLDBERG, ELIZABETH · 2019 to 2024
$1.5M
PROAACT- Admin SupplementK23HL143042 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, MICHELLE P · 2019 to 2023
$1.0M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health K23-HL143042NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL143042NIA NIH HHS K76 AG-059983NIA NIH HHS K76 AG059983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelehealth delivery expanded quickly during the COVID-19 pandemic after the reduction of payment and regulatory barriers, but older adults are the least likely to benefit from this expansion. Little is known about physician experiences initiating telehealth and factors that fostered or discouraged adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic with older adult patients. Therefore, our objective was to understand experiences of frontline physicians caring for older adults via telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews from September 2020 to November 2020 with 48 physicians. We recruited a diverse sample of geriatricians (n = 18), primary care (n = 15), and emergency (n = 15) physicians from all United Stated (US) regions, rural-urban settings, and academic-community practices who cared for older adult patients during the pandemic using purposive sampling methods. We completed framework analysis of the transcribed interviews to identify emerging themes and used the Quadruple Aim to organize themes.

resultsFrontline physicians described telehealth as a more flexible, value-based, and patient-centered mode of health care delivery. Benefits of using telehealth to treat older adults included reducing deferred care and increasing timely care, improving efficiency for physicians, enhancing communication with caregivers and patients, reducing patient travel burdens, and facilitating health outreach and education. Challenges included unequal access for rural, older, or cognitively impaired patients. Physicians noted that payment parity with in-person visits, between video and telephone visits, and relaxation of restrictive regulations would enhance their ability to continue to offer telehealth.

conclusionsFrontline physicians who treated older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic were largely in favor of continuing telehealth use beyond the pandemic; however, they noted that sustainability would depend on enacting policies that address access inequities and reimbursement concerns. Our data provide policy insights that if placed into action could facilitate the long-term success of telehealth and encourage a more flexible healthcare delivery system in the US.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansTelemedicineAgedHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19GeriatriciansPrimary careQualitative researchTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID35260091
PMCPMC8903127
OpenAlexW4220766045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.