Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35259820›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2022

Respiratory plasticity following spinal cord injury: perspectives from mouse to man.

Katherine C Locke, Margo L Randelman, Daniel J Hoh, Lyandysha V Zholudeva, Michael A Lane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Brain Plasticity in Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Regulation of Human Respiration by Electrical Stimulation.Journal of evolutionary biochemistry and physiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine C LockeDepartment of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Drexel University; Marion Murray Spinal Cord Research Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Margo L RandelmanDepartment of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Drexel University; Marion Murray Spinal Cord Research Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Daniel J HohLillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Lyandysha V ZholudevaMarion Murray Spinal Cord Research Center, Philadelphia, PA; Cardiovascular Disease, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michael A LaneDepartment of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Drexel University; Marion Murray Spinal Cord Research Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Neural transplants to promote respiratory plasticity after spinal cord injuryR01NS104291 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI LANE, MICHAEL ARON · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Engineering Human Interneurons for Neural RepairF32NS119348 · NINDS · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI ZHOLUDEVA, LYANDYSHA VIKTOROVNA · 2021 to 2022
$91k
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS119348NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of respiratory plasticity in animal models spans decades. At the bench, researchers use an array of techniques aimed at harnessing the power of plasticity within the central nervous system to restore respiration following spinal cord injury. This field of research is highly clinically relevant. People living with cervical spinal cord injury at or above the level of the phrenic motoneuron pool at spinal levels C3-C5 typically have significant impairments in breathing which may require assisted ventilation. Those who are ventilator dependent are at an increased risk of ventilator-associated co-morbidities and have a drastically reduced life expectancy. Pre-clinical research examining respiratory plasticity in animal models has laid the groundwork for clinical trials. Despite how widely researched this injury is in animal models, relatively few treatments have broken through the preclinical barrier. The three goals of this present review are to define plasticity as it pertains to respiratory function post-spinal cord injury, discuss plasticity models of spinal cord injury used in research, and explore the shift from preclinical to clinical research. By investigating current targets of respiratory plasticity research, we hope to illuminate preclinical work that can influence future clinical investigations and the advancement of treatments for spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

breathingphrenicplasticityrehabilitationrespirationspinal cord injurytranslation

Identifiers

PMID35259820
PMCPMC9083159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.