ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society
Long-term oxygen therapy prescription in India: Evaluation of compliance, factors affecting compliance, indications, and survival.
Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Long-term oxygen therapy - Supplement, maintenance, or palliative drug?Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The international data shows that long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) compliance is insufficient and variable. We conducted the first study from India on LTOT compliance, factors affecting compliance, indications, and survival through oxygen concentrator. Materials and Methods: Our organization from Delhi had given 378 oxygen concentrators over the last 5 years. We evaluated 120 patients randomly for participating in the study. Compliance was defined as the use of LTOT for at least 15 h/day. Results: Ninety-seven patients were included in the final analysis after exclusion criteria. The compliance to LTOT was seen in 45.36% (44/97). The commonest cause of noncompliance was lack of instructions (49.06%) followed by electricity issues, social stigma, and workplace constraints. A higher PaCO Conclusion: The adherence to LTOT in Indian patients is suboptimal mainly due to lack of instruction and is associated with a higher PaCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.