Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35259524›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise.

Kenneth I Vaden, Susan Teubner-Rhodes, Jayne B Ahlstrom, Judy R Dubno, Mark A Eckert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Executive Function Associations With Audibility-Adjusted Speech Perception in Noise.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Brain Network Interconnectivity Dynamics Explain Metacognitive Differences in Listening Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenneth I VadenHearing Research Program, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave. MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29455-5500, United States. Electronic address: vaden@musc.edu.
Susan Teubner-RhodesHearing Research Program, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave. MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29455-5500, United States; Department of Psychological Sciences, 226 Thach Hall, Auburn University, AL 36849-9027. Electronic address: teubner@auburn.edu.
Jayne B AhlstromHearing Research Program, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave. MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29455-5500, United States. Electronic address: ahlstrjb@musc.edu.
Judy R DubnoHearing Research Program, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave. MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29455-5500, United States. Electronic address: dubnojr@musc.edu.
Mark A EckertHearing Research Program, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave. MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29455-5500, United States. Electronic address: eckert@musc.edu.

Funding

SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN REALISTIC ENVIRONMENTSP50DC000422 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 1989 to 2025
$45.3M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
Interdisciplinary Research Training in Otolaryngology and Communication SciencesT32DC014435 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 2015 to 2024
$2.9M
RENOVATION TO SUPPORT SENSORY NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCHC06RR014516 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND, JOHN R · 1999 to 1999
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR014516NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000422NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC014435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive increases in cingulo-opercular frontal activity are typically observed during speech recognition in noise tasks. This elevated activity has been linked to a word recognition benefit on the next trial, termed "adaptive control," but how this effect might be implemented has been unclear. The established link between perceptual decision making and cingulo-opercular function may provide an explanation for how those regions benefit subsequent word recognition. In this case, processes that support recognition such as raising or lowering the decision criteria for more accurate or faster recognition may be adjusted to optimize performance on the next trial. The current neuroimaging study tested the hypothesis that pre-stimulus cingulo-opercular activity reflects criterion adjustments that determine how much information to collect for word recognition on subsequent trials. Participants included middle-age and older adults (N = 30; age = 58.3 ± 8.8 years; m ± sd) with normal hearing or mild sensorineural hearing loss. During a sparse fMRI experiment, words were presented in multitalker babble at +3 dB or +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which participants were instructed to repeat aloud. Word recognition was significantly poorer with increasing participant age and lower SNR compared to higher SNR conditions. A perceptual decision-making model was used to characterize processing differences based on task response latency distributions. The model showed that significantly less sensory evidence was collected (i.e., lower criteria) for lower compared to higher SNR trials. Replicating earlier observations, pre-stimulus cingulo-opercular activity was significantly predictive of correct recognition on a subsequent trial. Individual differences showed that participants with higher criteria also benefitted the most from pre-stimulus activity. Moreover, trial-level criteria changes were significantly linked to higher versus lower pre-stimulus activity. These results suggest cingulo-opercular cortex contributes to criteria adjustments to optimize speech recognition task performance.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionAgedHumansMiddle AgedNoisePerceptual MaskingRecognition, PsychologySignal-To-Noise RatioSpeechAdaptive controlDecision criteriafMRIFrontal cortexPerceptual decision-makingSpeech recognition in noise

Identifiers

PMID35259524
PMCPMC9082296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.