Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35259409›Full record

ArticleContraception2022

Association of the affordable care act Medicaid expansions with postpartum contraceptive use and early postpartum pregnancy.

Erica L Eliason, Amanda Spishak-Thomas, Maria W Steenland

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Understanding of Lactational Amenorrhea As a Contraceptive Method Among U.S. Pregnant Women.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Barriers and Needs for Postpartum Contraception.Maternal and child health journal · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Erica L EliasonDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence RI, United States. Electronic address: erica_eliason@brown.edu.
Amanda Spishak-ThomasColumbia University School of Social Work, New York NY, United States.
Maria W SteenlandPopulation Studies and Training Center, Brown University, Providence RI, United States.
Brown University · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Science/Technical CoreP2CHD041020 · NICHD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ZHENCHAO QIAN · 2016 to 2026
$7.6M
National Research Service AwardT32HS000011 · AHRQ · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI TRIVEDI, AMAL N. · 1986 to 2024
$6.1M
Reducing Postpartum Health Care Disparities through Increased Insurance Coverage after ChildbirthK01HS027464 · AHRQ · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI STEENLAND, MARIA WARD · 2020 to 2024
$741k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS027464AHRQ HHS T32 HS000011NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBefore the Affordable Care Act (ACA), 55% of individuals giving birth with Medicaid lost insurance postpartum, potentially affecting their access to postpartum contraception. We evaluate the association of the ACA Medicaid expansions with postpartum contraceptive use and pregnancy at the time of the survey.

methodsWe used 2012-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data to estimate difference-in-difference models for the association of Medicaid expansions with the use of postpartum contraception (mean: 4 months postpartum): any contraception, long-acting reversible contraception, or LARC (contraceptive implant and intrauterine device), short-acting (contraceptive pill, patch, and ring), permanent, or non-prescription methods (condoms, rhythm method, and withdrawal), and pregnancy at the time of the survey. We examine low-income respondents overall and stratified by race and ethnicity.

resultsWe find that Medicaid expansion was associated with a 7.0 percentage point (95% CI: 3.0, 11.0) increase in postpartum LARC, a 3.1 percentage point (95% CI: -6.0, -0.2) decrease in short-acting contraception, and a 3.9 percentage point (95% CI: -6.2, -1.5) decrease in non-prescription contraceptive use overall. In stratified analyses, we find that increases in LARC use were concentrated among non-Hispanic White and Black respondents, with shifts in other postpartum contraceptives towards LARCs. Medicaid expansion was associated with a decrease in early postpartum pregnancy only among non-Hispanic Black respondents.

conclusionsMedicaid expansions led to shifts from methods with a lower upfront out-of-pocket cost for people without insurance towards methods with the higher upfront out-of-pocket cost for people without insurance. These changes suggest that Medicaid expansion improved postpartum contraceptive access. IMPLICATIONS: These findings indicate that postpartum uninsurance was a barrier to postpartum contraceptive access prior to Medicaid expansions under the Affordable Care Act. Medicaid expansions increased access to the full range of contraceptive methods.

Indexed as

MedicaidPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActContraceptionContraceptive AgentsFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyUnited StatesContraceptive AgentsAccess to careAffordable Care ActFamily planning servicesPRAMSReproductive health care

Identifiers

PMID35259409
PMCPMC9378469
OpenAlexW4221136353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.