Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35258937›Full record

ArticleACS nano2022

Unraveling the Mechanics of a Repeat-Protein Nanospring: From Folding of Individual Repeats to Fluctuations of the Superhelix.

Marie Synakewicz, Rohan S Eapen, Albert Perez-Riba, Pamela J E Rowling, Daniela Bauer, Andreas Weißl, Gerhard Fischer, Marko Hyvönen, Matthias Rief, Laura S Itzhaki and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Stick-slip unfolding favors self-association of expandedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marie SynakewiczDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1PD, United Kingdom†.ORCID 0000-0003-0256-2712
Rohan S EapenDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1PD, United Kingdom†.
Albert Perez-RibaDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1PD, United Kingdom†.
Pamela J E RowlingDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1PD, United Kingdom†.
Daniela BauerPhysik-Department, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Straße 1, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Andreas WeißlPhysik-Department, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Straße 1, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Gerhard FischerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1GA, United Kingdom.
Marko HyvönenDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1GA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8683-4070
Matthias RiefPhysik-Department, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Straße 1, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Laura S ItzhakiDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1PD, United Kingdom†.ORCID 0000-0001-6504-2576
Johannes StiglerGene Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Feodor-Lynen-Straße 25, 81377 München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tandem-repeat proteins comprise small secondary structure motifs that stack to form one-dimensional arrays with distinctive mechanical properties that are proposed to direct their cellular functions. Here, we use single-molecule optical tweezers to study the folding of consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs), superhelical arrays of short helix-turn-helix motifs. We find that CTPRs display a spring-like mechanical response in which individual repeats undergo rapid equilibrium fluctuations between partially folded and unfolded conformations. We rationalize the force response using Ising models and dissect the folding pathway of CTPRs under mechanical load, revealing how the repeat arrays form from the center toward both termini simultaneously. Most strikingly, we also directly observe the protein's superhelical tertiary structure in the force signal. Using protein engineering, crystallography, and single-molecule experiments, we show that the superhelical geometry can be altered by carefully placed amino acid substitutions, and we examine how these sequence changes affect intrinsic repeat stability and inter-repeat coupling. Our findings provide the means to dissect and modulate repeat-protein stability and dynamics, which will be essential for researchers to understand the function of natural repeat proteins and to exploit artificial repeats proteins in nanotechnology and biomedical applications.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingProteinsProtein StabilityProtein Structure, SecondaryThermodynamicsProteinsIsing modelsoptical tweezersprotein foldingprotein mechanicsrepeat proteins

Identifiers

PMID35258937
PMCPMC8944806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.