Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35258804›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022

Research engagement and experiences of patients pre- and post-implant of a left ventricular assist device from the mechanical circulatory support measures of adjustment and quality of life (MCS A-QOL) study.

Allison J Carroll, Elizabeth A Hahn, Kathleen L Grady

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03044535 (Mechanical Circulatory Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 66% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03044535 completednot on this map

Mechanical Circulatory Support: Measures of Adjustment and Quality of Life

TypeobservationalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled895ConditionsQuality of Life, Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Diseases
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Efficient measurement of multiple ventricular assist device patient-reported outcomes: Creation of a 20-item profile from the MCS A-QOL study.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allison J CarrollDepartments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. allison.carroll@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3576-8808
Elizabeth A HahnDepartments of Medical Social Sciences and Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kathleen L GradyDepartment of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery and Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Mechanical circulatory support: Measures of adjustment and quality of lifeR01HL130502 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GRADY, KATHLEEN L, HAHN, ELIZABETH A · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01HL130502-01NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdults living with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) present with unique challenges (e.g., left ventricular assist device [LVAD]-related self-care, adverse events) to research study enrollment, engagement, and completion. The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences of adults with MCS who were eligible for and enrolled in a study of health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

methodsIn a secondary analysis of data from the Mechanical Circulatory Support: Measures of Adjustment and Quality of Life study, we used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate research engagement and experiences among adults preparing to undergo or currently living with MCS implant. First, we assessed the cascade of study engagement. Second, we assessed research experiences using a structured interview developed for this study.

resultsOf 1011 participants approached for the study, 86.7% enrolled, 12.7% declined, and 0.6% were ineligible. Of 877 participants enrolled, 272 were pre-implant (of whom 88% completed assessments; "respondents") and 605 were post-implant (of whom 74% completed assessments). Only 14% of respondents reported difficulty completing the questionnaires, 54% had previously used an iPad to complete questionnaires, and 62% reported that their experience was "as expected." Respondents qualitatively described both positive (e.g., value of research) and negative (e.g., too much time) research experiences, difficulties completing questionnaires (e.g., online platform, health literacy issues), and provided recommendations for the questionnaires and delivery.

conclusionsParticipants enjoyed participating in HRQOL research focused on MCS and had unique perspectives for improving the questionnaires. It is important to minimize the burden of participation and critical to be flexible to meet participant preferences for research engagement.

trial registrationNCT03044535 (accessible at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03044535 ), registered February 7, 2017.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureQuality of LifeAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultBiomedical ResearchCost of IllnessHumansPatient ParticipationPostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeHeart failureMechanical circulatory supportPatient-reported outcomesQualitative researchResearch experience

Identifiers

PMID35258804
PMCPMC10284295
OpenAlexW4220988854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.