ArticleJournal of cross-cultural gerontology2022
"I Know Hyena. Do you Know Hyena?" Challenges in Interpreter-Mediated Dementia Assessment, Focusing on the Role of the Interpreter.
Article in Journal of cross-cultural gerontology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpreter Communication Quality in Cognitive Assessments for Dementia: The MINDSET Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Assessing the Utility of Automated and Pen-And-Paper Cognitive Assessment Tools for Underrepresented Groups in the UK.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2026Article
- Implementing interpreter training for dementia assessments at national scale using the RE-AIM framework: a mixed-methods evaluation.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Overreliance on cultural doulas: the paradox of entrusting the communication and care of high-risk migrant women to cultural doulas.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Assessment of Dementia in Minority Ethnic Groups in Europe: A 14-Year Follow-Up Survey.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2024Article
- Breaking the barriers: overcoming dementia-related stigma in minority communities.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- The impact of training on communication quality during interpreter-mediated cognitive assessments: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2022Article
- Cognitive Assessment in Culturally, Linguistically, and Educationally Diverse Older Populations in Europe.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dementia assessment requires functional communication and interaction between healthcare professionals and the patient being assessed. These can be affected by the requirement for an interpreter to communicate with the patient. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the interactions between patient, healthcare professionals and interpreter, focusing on the role of the interpreter and the challenges that may arise in interpreter-mediated dementia assessment. The study had an ethnographic design in which the data consisted of audio and video recordings of 19 dementia assessments conducted in the presence of an interpreter. The data were analyzed using the constant comparative method. The results showed that the interpreter could affect the patient's performance and results during the dementia assessment. The interpreter could alter the meaning and content of what was communicated, sometimes change information and instructions exchanged between the patient and healthcare professionals, could avoid interpreting everything being said, and occasionally made their own corrections to what was being communicated. This occurred mainly because of the interpreter's lack of linguistic skills and the interpreter failing to adhere to the ethical guidelines governing their profession. These challenges could also occur when the interpreter was not familiar with the context of dementia assessment. Alterations made by the interpreter to what was being communicated could lead to incorrect evaluation of the patient's cognitive abilities and health status. This, in turn, may lead to misjudgment of the patient's remaining resources and symptoms and their required treatment and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.