Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35258760›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2022

Approaches for Discussing Clinical Trials with Pediatric Oncology Patients and Their Families.

Lindsay J Blazin, Andrea Cuviello, Holly Spraker-Perlman, Erica C Kaye

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Moving toward precision communication in pediatric oncology clinical trials: An outline of a conceptual framework to support caregiver decision-making.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lindsay J BlazinDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Indiana University, 705 Riley Hospital Dr., Suite 4340, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. lblazin@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9651-0616
Andrea CuvielloDepartment of Oncology, Division of Quality of Life & Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, MS 260, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7684-6841
Holly Spraker-PerlmanDepartment of Oncology, Division of Quality of Life & Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, MS 260, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7070-3666
Erica C KayeDepartment of Oncology, Division of Quality of Life & Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, MS 260, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6522-3876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis manuscript aims to describe evidence-based best practices to guide clinicians in communicating with pediatric patients and their families about clinical trial enrollment. RECENT

findingsThe standard paradigm for discussing clinical trial enrollment with pediatric oncology patients and their families inconsistently enables or facilitates true informed consent. Evidence exists to suggest that adopting a shared decision-making approach may improve patient and family understanding. When navigating communication about clinical trials, clinicians should integrate the following evidence-based communication approaches: (1) extend dialogue about clinical trial enrollment across multiple conversations, allowing families space and time to process information independently; (2) use core communication skills such as avoiding jargon, checking for understanding, and responding to emotion. Clinicians should consider factors at the individual, team, organizational, community, and policy levels that may impact clinical trial communication with pediatric cancer patients and their families. This article reviews learnable skills that clinicians can master to optimize communication about clinical trial enrollment with pediatric cancer patients and their families.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCommunicationNeoplasmsChildHumansInformed ConsentProfessional-Family RelationsClinical trialCommunicationInformed consentPediatric cancerPediatric oncology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.