Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35258717›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022

Optimizing intraocular lens power calculation using adjusted conventional keratometry for cataract surgery combined with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Raphael Diener, Maximilian Treder, Jost Lennart Lauermann, Nicole Eter, Maged Alnawaiseh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cataract surgery with corneal endothelial pathology.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Review
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raphael DienerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany. raphael.diener@ukmuenster.de.
Maximilian TrederDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Jost Lennart LauermannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Nicole EterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Maged AlnawaisehDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Klinikum Fulda · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the utility of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using adjusted conventional keratometry (K) according to postoperative posterior to preoperative anterior corneal curvature radii (PPPA) ratio for eyes with Fuch's dystrophy undergoing cataract surgery combined with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (triple DMEK).

methodsA fictitious refractive index (FRI) was determined (Pentacam HR®) based on the PPPA ratio in 50 eyes undergoing triple DMEK. Adjusted corneal power was calculated in every eye using adjusted K values: K values determined by the IOLMaster were converted to adjusted anterior corneal radius using the mean FRI. Posterior corneal radius was calculated using the mean PPPA ratio. Adjusted corneal power was determined based on the calculated corneal radii and thick lens formula. Refractive errors calculated using the Haigis, SRK/T, and HofferQ formulae based on the adjusted corneal power were compared with those based on conventional K measurements.

resultsCalculated PPPA ratio and FRI were 0.801 and 1.3271. Mean prediction error based on conventional K was in the hyperopic direction (Haigis: 0.84D; SRK/T: 0.74D; HofferQ: 0.74D) and significantly higher (P < 0.001) than that based on adjusted corneal power (0.18D, 0.22D, and 15D, respectively). When calculated according to adjusted corneal power, the percentage of eyes with a hyperopic shift > 0.5D fell significantly from 64 to 30% (Haigis), 62 to 36% (SRK/T), and 58 to 26% (HofferQ), respectively.

conclusionIOL power calculation based on adjusted corneal power can be used to reduce the risk of a hyperopic shift after triple DMEK and provides a more accurate refractive outcome than IOL power calculation using conventional K.

Indexed as

CataractCorneal TransplantationHyperopiaLenses, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationBiometryCorneaDescemet MembraneHumansRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesAdjusted keratometryConventional keratometryDMEKHyperopic shiftIOL power calculationPA ratioPosterior to anterior corneal curvature radii ratioTriple DMEK

Identifiers

PMID35258717
PMCPMC9418294
OpenAlexW4221137252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.