Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35258694›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2023

[Drug therapy safety supported by interprofessional collaboration between ICU physicians and clinical pharmacists in critical care units in Germany : Results of a survey].

Heike Hilgarth, Christian Waydhas, Frank Dörje, Julia Sommer, Stefan Kluge, Karl Peter Ittner

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Ward-based clinical pharmacists in intensive care medicine: an economic evaluation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Heike HilgarthKlinikapotheke und Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4126-4251
Christian WaydhasSektionsgruppe Qualitätsverbesserung und Informationstechnologie, Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI), Berlin, Deutschland.
Frank DörjeAusschuss für Intensivmedizin und klinische Ernährung, ADKA - Bundesverband Deutscher Krankenhausapotheker e. V., Berlin, Deutschland.
Julia SommerApotheke des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Stefan KlugeKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Karl Peter IttnerSektionsgruppe Qualitätsverbesserung und Informationstechnologie, Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI), Berlin, Deutschland. karl-peter.ittner@ukr.de.
Deutscher Bundestag · DEDeutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritically ill patients are particularly susceptible to adverse drug events. International studies show that pharmaceutical care has a positive impact on patient and drug therapy safety. Nationally, the integration of pharmacists into the multidisciplinary team and participation in ward rounds is required. The aim of this work is to assess the scope and extent of pharmaceutical care in intensive care units (ICU) in Germany.

methodIn a literature and database search, 13 relevant pharmaceutical activities were identified. Based on this, an online survey with 27 questions on the implementation of pharmaceutical care in ICU was prepared by a panel of experts. The survey was sent to heads of German ICUs.

resultsOf the participants, 35.3% (59/167) have established regular pharmaceutical care. Drug information (89.7% [52/58]), pharmaceutical interventions with change of therapy (e.g., ward rounds; 67,2% [39/58]), regular evaluation of prescriptions (medication analysis; 65.5% [38/58]) as well as the monitoring of medication (e.g., side effects, effectiveness, costs; 63.8% [37/58]) were most frequently mentioned. The participants with pharmaceutical care (58/168) graded 7 of 13 but those without (104/168) only two  activities as 'essential/indispensable'.

conclusionOnly a few ICU in Germany have already integrated ward pharmacists into the multidisciplinary team. Once a pharmaceutical service has been established, a greater role/importance is assigned to several pharmaceutical activities.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPhysiciansCritical CareGermanyHumansIntensive Care UnitsPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacistsPharmaceutical PreparationsClinical pharmacistCritical careDrug therapy safetyPatient safetyPharmaceutical care

Identifiers

PMID35258694
PMCPMC9992023
OpenAlexW4220681579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.