Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35258681›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2022

Velocity-based resistance training: do women need greater velocity loss to maximize adaptations?

J Rissanen, S Walker, F Pareja-Blanco, K Häkkinen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J RissanenNeuroMuscular Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Room VIV225, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
S WalkerNeuroMuscular Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Room VIV225, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland. simon.walker@jyu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6804-0741
F Pareja-BlancoDepartment of Sports and Computer Sciences, Physical Performance and Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7184-7610
K HäkkinenNeuroMuscular Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Room VIV225, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
University of Jyväskylä · FIUniversidad Pablo de Olavide · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMen and women typically display different neuromuscular characteristics, force-velocity relationships, and differing strength deficit (upper vs. lower body). Thus, it is not clear how previous recommendations for training with velocity-loss resistance training based on data in men will apply to women. This study examined the inter-sex differences in neuromuscular adaptations using 20% and 40% velocity-loss protocols in back squat and bench press exercises.

methodsThe present study employed an 8-week intervention (2 × week) comparing 20% vs. 40% velocity-loss resistance training in the back squat and bench press exercises in young men and women (~ 26 years). Maximum strength (1-RM) and submaximal-load mean propulsive velocity (MPV) for low- and high-velocity lifts in squat and bench press, countermovement jump and vastus lateralis cross-sectional area were measured at pre-, mid-, and post-training. Surface EMG of quadriceps measured muscle activity during performance tests.

resultsAll groups increased 1-RM strength in squat and bench press exercises, as well as MPV using submaximal loads and countermovement jump height (P < 0.05). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed, but higher magnitudes following 40% velocity loss in 1-RM (g = 0.60) and in low- (g = 1.42) and high-velocity (g = 0.98) lifts occurred in women. Training-induced improvements were accompanied by increases in surface EMG amplitude and vastus lateralis cross-sectional area.

conclusionSimilar increases in strength and power performance were observed in men and women over 8 weeks of velocity-based resistance training. However, some results suggest that strength and power gains favor using 40% rather than 20% velocity loss in women.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingAdaptation, PhysiologicalExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthQuadriceps MuscleHypertrophyMean propulsive velocityMuscle activitySex differencesStrength trainingTraining volume

Identifiers

PMID35258681
PMCPMC9012837
OpenAlexW4221012818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.