Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35258579›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Effect of Pulsed Low-Intensity Ultrasonography on Symptom Relief and Tibiofemoral Articular Cartilage Thickness Among Veterans Affairs Enrollees With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Allen D Sawitzke, Christopher G Jackson, Kimberly Carlson, Marcel D Bizien, Mathew Leiner, Domenic J Reda, Tom Sindowski, Christopher Hanrahan, Richard G Spencer, C Kent Kwoh and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02034409 (A Pilot Trial to Assess Low-Intensity Ultrasound in Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02034409 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Pilot Trial to Assess Low-Intensity Ultrasound in Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2015 to 2020Enrolled140ConditionsOsteoarthritis, DegenerativeArmsPulsed Low Intensity Ultrasound, Sham Comparator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Allen D SawitzkeDepartment of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Christopher G JacksonDepartment of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Kimberly CarlsonEdward Hines Junior VA Hospital Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Hines, Illinois.
Marcel D BizienVA Cooperative Studies Program, Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Mathew LeinerEdward Hines Junior VA Hospital Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Hines, Illinois.
Domenic J RedaEdward Hines Junior VA Hospital Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Hines, Illinois.
Tom SindowskiEdward Hines Junior VA Hospital Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Hines, Illinois.
Christopher HanrahanDepartment of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Richard G SpencerNational Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, Baltimore, Maryland.
C Kent KwohUniversity of Arizona Arthritis Center, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Susan J LeeVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.
Kalli HoseDepartment of Medicine, San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego, California.
Lisa RobinEdward Hines Junior VA Hospital Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Hines, Illinois.
Donna W CainVA Cooperative Studies Program, Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Meredith D TaylorDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Neal BangerterDepartment of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Martha FincoGeorge E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Daniel O CleggDepartment of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · USUniversity of Utah · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USBrigham Young University · USGeorge E. Wahlen Department of VA Medical Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California San Diego Medical Center · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of disability in the US, with no approved treatments to slow progression, but animal models suggest that pulsed low-intensity ultrasonography (PLIUS) may promote cartilage growth. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of PLIUS in providing symptom reduction and decreased loss of tibiofemoral cartilage thickness in patients with knee OA. Design, Setting, and Participants: A phase 2A, sham-controlled, parallel, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted at 2 Veterans Affairs hospitals in Salt Lake City, Utah, and San Diego, California, from May 22, 2015, to January 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from June 27, 2020, to October 20, 2020. Participants recruited through the US Department of Veterans Affairs (N = 132) with clinical and radiographic evidence of early knee OA were randomly assigned to receive PLIUS or a sham device, self-administered for 20 minutes daily over the medial compartment of the knee. All enrollees participated in a 4-week prerandomization sham run-in period, followed by a 48-week treatment period. Randomization was stratified by study site and Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1 (n = 15), 2 (n = 51), and 3 (n = 66). Intervention: Participants either received 48 weeks of PLIUS or sham ultrasonography. Main Outcomes and Measures: The trial incorporated 2 coprimary outcomes: symptomatic improvement assessed by Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International Responder Criteria (ie, met if either >50% improvement in pain and function with at least a 20% absolute improvement of at least 2 of the following 3 factors: improvement by at least 20% [pain, function, and patient global assessment] with at least a 10-mm absolute improvement), and cartilage preservation assessed as change in central medial femoral condyle cartilage thickness by magnetic resonance imaging. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. Results: The mean (SD) participant age was 63.6 (10.7) years and 119 were men (90.2%). The mean (SD) duration of OA symptoms was 13.4 (12.3) years. In the PLIUS group, 70.4% (95% CI, 58.2%-82.6%) of the participants experienced symptomatic improvement, compared with 67.3% (95% CI, 54.9%-79.7%) of participants in the sham group (P = .84); there was no statistically significant difference in response rates between the treatment groups, and the between-group rate difference of 3.1% (95% CI, -14.3% to 20.5%) did not meet the predefined 10% threshold for clinically significant symptomatic improvement from application of PLIUS. At 48 weeks of treatment, central medial femoral condyle cartilage thickness decreased by a mean (SD) of 73.8 (168.1) μm in the PLIUS group and by 42.2 (297.0) μm in the sham group. This 48-week mean change between the 2 groups did not reach statistical significance (P = .44), and the between-group 48-week difference of -31.7 μm (95% CI, -129.0 μm to 65.7 μm) did not meet the predefined threshold. There were 99 nonserious adverse events in the PLIUS group and 89 in the sham group during the trial. No serious adverse events were deemed related to the study device. Conclusions and Relevance: PLIUS, as implemented in this study, demonstrated neither symptomatic benefit nor a decrease in loss of tibiofemoral cartilage thickness in knee OA. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02034409.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularOsteoarthritis, KneeVeteransDouble-Blind MethodHumansPainUltrasonographyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35258579
PMCPMC8905392
OpenAlexW4221093466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.