Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35258520›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2022

Perceptions, knowledge and attitudes about COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in older Portuguese adults.

Tânia Magalhães Silva, Marta Estrela, Vítor Roque, Eva Rebelo Gomes, Adolfo Figueiras, Fátima Roque, Maria Teresa Herdeiro

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. How Portuguese Health Entities Used Social Media to Face the Public Health Emergency during COVID-19 Disease.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Geographic Differences in Vaccine Hesitancy Among Older Adults.The Public policy and aging report · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Tânia Magalhães SilvaiBiMED - Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Marta EstrelaiBiMED - Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6123-3818
Vítor RoqueResearch Unit for Inland Development, Guarda Polytechnic Institute (UDI-IPG), Guarda, Portugal.
Eva Rebelo GomesAllergy and Clinical Immunology Service, University Hospital Center of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Adolfo FigueirasHealth Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Fátima RoqueResearch Unit for Inland Development, Guarda Polytechnic Institute (UDI-IPG), Guarda, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0169-3788
Maria Teresa HerdeiroiBiMED - Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Institute for Biomedicine · ITENT and Allergy · USInstituto Politécnico da Guarda · PTUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversity of Beira Interior · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has become a public-health emergency of international concern. Most efforts to contain the spread and transmission of the virus rely on campaigns and interventions targeted to reduce Vaccine Hesitancy and Refusal (VHR).

objectivethis study aims to assess the major factors associated with VHR in the older population in Portugal.

methodsa nation-wide cross-sectional study was conducted in the older Portuguese population (≥65 years old) through computer-assisted telephone interviewing. Logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of the independent variables (perceptions, knowledge and attitudes) and of the outcome (VHR).

resultsthe response rate was 60.1% (602/1,001). Perceptions, knowledge and attitudes were strongly associated with VHR probability. A 1-point Likert scale increase in concerns about the vaccines' efficacy and safety increased the risk of VHR by 1.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-6.28) and 3.13 (95%CI: 2.08-8.22), respectively. A reduction of VHR probability for 'reliability of the information released by social media' (OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.16-0.70) and for 'trust in national and international competent authorities' (OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.17-0.69) is also observed per 1-point increase.

conclusionsas VHR seems to be strongly associated with perceptions, knowledge and attitudes, the design and promotion of vaccination campaigns/educational interventions specifically targeted at changing these potentially modifiable determinants may help to tackle COVID-19 VHR and achieve a wider vaccine coverage.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAgedAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPortugalReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Vaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19hesitancyolder adultsolder peoplePortugalvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35258520
PMCPMC8992312
OpenAlexW4205665110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.