Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35258340›Full record

ArticlemSystems2022

Quantifying and Cataloguing Unknown Sequences within Human Microbiomes.

Sejal Modha, David L Robertson, Joseph Hughes, Richard J Orton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Gut · 2026
    Article
  3. NEAR: neural embeddings for amino acid relationships.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  4. NEAR: Neural Embeddings for Amino acid Relationships.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sensitive and error-tolerant annotation of protein-coding DNA with BATH.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sejal ModhaMRC University of Glasgowgrid.8756.c Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8440-885X
David L RobertsonMRC University of Glasgowgrid.8756.c Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6338-0221
Joseph Hughes *MRC University of Glasgowgrid.8756.c Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2556-2563
Richard J Orton *MRC University of Glasgowgrid.8756.c Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3389-4325
MRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/12UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_1201412UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/S502479/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in genome sequencing technologies and lower costs have enabled the exploration of a multitude of known and novel environments and microbiomes. This has led to an exponential growth in the raw sequence data that are deposited in online repositories. Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data sets are typically analysed with regard to a specific biological question. However, it is widely acknowledged that these data sets are comprised of a proportion of sequences that bear no similarity to any currently known biological sequence, and this so-called "dark matter" is often excluded from downstream analyses. In this study, a systematic framework was developed to assemble, identify, and measure the proportion of unknown sequences present in distinct human microbiomes. This framework was applied to 40 distinct studies, comprising 963 samples, and covering 10 different human microbiomes including fecal, oral, lung, skin, and circulatory system microbiomes. We found that while the human microbiome is one of the most extensively studied, on average 2% of assembled sequences have not yet been taxonomically defined. However, this proportion varied extensively among different microbiomes and was as high as 25% for skin and oral microbiomes that have more interactions with the environment. A rate of taxonomic characterization of 1.64% of unknown sequences being characterized per month was calculated from these taxonomically unknown sequences discovered in this study. A cross-study comparison led to the identification of similar unknown sequences in different samples and/or microbiomes. Both our computational framework and the novel unknown sequences produced are publicly available for future cross-referencing. Our approach led to the discovery of several novel viral genomes that bear no similarity to sequences in the public databases. Some of these are widespread as they have been found in different microbiomes and studies. Hence, our study illustrates how the systematic characterization of unknown sequences can help the discovery of novel microbes, and we call on the research community to systematically collate and share the unknown sequences from metagenomic studies to increase the rate at which the unknown sequence space can be classified.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaUrsidaeAnimalsDatabases, FactualHumansMetagenomeMetagenomicsdark mattergenome assemblyhuman microbiomemetagenomicsmicrobial dark matternovel sequencesunknown sequencesvirus

Identifiers

PMID35258340
PMCPMC9052204
OpenAlexW4220662153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.