ArticlePediatric transplantation2022
Effect of ischemic time on pediatric heart transplantation outcomes: is it the same for all allografts?
Article in Pediatric transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preservation of pediatric donor hearts via subnormothermic machine perfusion: Comparison to cold storage.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Impact of Primary Diagnosis on the Outcome of Heart Transplantation in Children.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies have shown that the optimal ischemia time (IT) threshold in pediatric heart transplantation (PHT) is up to 4 h, independent of other donor organ factors. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between IT and donor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and study their impact on PHT outcomes.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of PHT (<18 years) identified in UNOS between January 2000 and March 2020. Post-transplantation survival analysis of patients receiving donor hearts with IT<4, 4-6, and >6 h was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cohort was divided according to donor LVEF median value, and survival was analyzed. Cox regression was performed.
resultsMedian LVEF was 65% in the study cohort (6669 PHT). Overall, IT>6 h was associated with worse survival compared to <4 h regardless of donor LVEF. For allografts with LVEF < 65%, IT = 4-6 h was associated with worse survival compared with IT < 4 h (p = .006) but had similar survival compared with IT > 6 h (p = .315). For allografts with LVEF ≥ 65%, IT = 4-6 h had similar survival compared with <4 h (p = .175) but improved survival compared with >6 h (p = .003). After adjusting for donor and recipient variables, Cox regression showed that IT = 4-6 h was not associated with increased mortality for LVEF ≥ 65%.
conclusionsThe IT threshold of 4 h does not apply to all allografts. Recipients of hearts with LVEF≥65% can tolerate an IT up to 6 h without any detriment to survival. Routine acceptance of these donor hearts could mitigate longer waiting times and poor donor availability for many candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.