Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35258087›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2022

Colour discrimination thresholds vary throughout colour space in a reef fish (Rhinecanthus aculeatus).

Naomi F Green, Emily Guevara, Daniel C Osorio, John A Endler, N Justin Marshall, Misha Vorobyev, Karen L Cheney

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The fish challenge to vertebrate cognitive evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Naomi F GreenSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5199-7857
Emily GuevaraSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Daniel C OsorioSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5856-527X
John A EndlerCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Victoria 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-7627
N Justin MarshallQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-6713
Misha VorobyevDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7615-5816
Karen L CheneySchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5622-9494
The University of Queensland · AUDeakin University · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Australian Research Council DP150102710The University of Queensland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals use colour vision in a range of behaviours. Visual performance is limited by thresholds, which are set by noise in photoreceptors and subsequent neural processing. The receptor noise limited (RNL) model of colour discrimination is widely used for modelling colour vision and accounts well for experimental data from many species. In one of the most comprehensive tests yet of colour discrimination in a non-human species, we used Ishihara-style stimulus patterns to examine thresholds for 21 directions at five locations in colour space for the fish Rhinecanthus aculeatus. Thresholds matched RNL model predictions most closely for stimuli near the achromatic point, but exceeded predictions (indicating a decline in sensitivity) with distance from this point. Thresholds were also usually higher for saturation than for hue differences. These changes in colour threshold with colour space location and direction may give insight into photoreceptor non-linearities and post-receptoral mechanisms of colour vision in fish. Our results highlight the need for a cautious interpretation of the RNL model - especially for modelling colours that differ from one another in saturation (rather than hue), and for highly saturated colours distant from the achromatic point in colour space.

Indexed as

Color VisionTetraodontiformesAnimalsColorColor PerceptionSensory ThresholdsColour thresholdsColour visionDiscrimination thresholdsReceptor noise limited modelVisual ecology

Identifiers

PMID35258087
PMCPMC9080749
OpenAlexW4220969774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.