ArticleNanoscale2022
Purely electrical SARS-CoV-2 sensing based on single-molecule counting.
Article in Nanoscale, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a triplex RT-qPCR assay for rapid and accurate detection of porcine rotavirus, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, and porcine deltacoronavirus.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- The Emergence of Nanofluidics for Single-Biomolecule Manipulation and Sensing.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Amplification-Free Quantification of Endogenous Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Using Solid-State Nanopores.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Solid-State Nanopores for Biomolecular Analysis and Detection.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2024Review
- Multiplexed detection of viral antigen and RNA using nanopore sensing and encoded molecular probes.Nature communications · 2023Article
- PCR-Free Innovative Strategies for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Review
- Over 30-Fold Enhancement in DNA Translocation Dynamics through Nanoscale Pores Coated with an Anionic Surfactant.Nano letters · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The majority of RNA based COVID-19 diagnostics employ enzymatic amplification to achieve high sensitivity, but this relies on arbitrary thresholding, which complicates the comparison of test results and may lead to false outcomes. Here we introduce solid-state nanopore sensing for label-free quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical nasal swab samples. This PCR-free method involves reverse transcribing a target gene on the viral RNA before enzymatically digesting all but the resulting dsDNA. Ratiometric quantification of RNA abundance is achieved by single-molecule counting and length-based nanopore identification of dsDNA from a SARS-CoV-2 gene and a human reference gene. We graded nasal swab samples from >15 subjects and find that the SARS-CoV-2 ratiometric nanopore index correlates well with the reported RT-qPCR threshold cycle for positive classified samples. Remarkably, nanopore analysis also reports quantitative positive outcomes for clinical samples classified as negative by RT-qPCR, suggesting that the method may be used to diagnose COVID-19 in samples that may evade detection. We show that the sample preparation workflow can be implemented using a compact microfluidic device with integrated thermal control for semi-automated processing of extremely small sample volumes, offering a viable route towards automated, fast and affordable RNA quantification in a small and portable device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.