Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35257937›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2022

Evaluating depression and anxiety throughout pregnancy and after birth: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cindy X W Zhang, Justin C Okeke, Robert D Levitan, Kellie E Murphy, Kim Foshay, Stephen J Lye, Julia A Knight, Stephen G Matthews

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Cohort Profile: The Ontario Birth Study (OBS).International journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cindy X W ZhangDepartment of Physiology, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Ms Zhang, Dr Murphy, Ms Foshay, and Drs Lye and Matthews). Electronic address: Scindyxin.zhang@alum.utoronto.ca.
Justin C OkekeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sinai Health System, New York City, NY (Mr Okeke and Drs Murphy, Lye, and Matthews).
Robert D LevitanMood and Anxiety Disorders Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Levitan); Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Levitan).
Kellie E MurphyDepartment of Physiology, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Ms Zhang, Dr Murphy, Ms Foshay, and Drs Lye and Matthews); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sinai Health System, New York City, NY (Mr Okeke and Drs Murphy, Lye, and Matthews).
Kim FoshayDepartment of Physiology, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Ms Zhang, Dr Murphy, Ms Foshay, and Drs Lye and Matthews).
Stephen J LyeDepartment of Physiology, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Ms Zhang, Dr Murphy, Ms Foshay, and Drs Lye and Matthews); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sinai Health System, New York City, NY (Mr Okeke and Drs Murphy, Lye, and Matthews); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Ontario, Canada (Drs Lye, Knight, and Matthews); and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Julia A KnightLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Ontario, Canada (Drs Lye, Knight, and Matthews); Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Knight).
Stephen G MatthewsDepartment of Physiology, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Ms Zhang, Dr Murphy, Ms Foshay, and Drs Lye and Matthews); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sinai Health System, New York City, NY (Mr Okeke and Drs Murphy, Lye, and Matthews); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Ontario, Canada (Drs Lye, Knight, and Matthews); and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mount Sinai Hospital · CASinai Health System · US

Funding

CIHR FDN-148368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic presents unique social, economic, and psychological challenges for individuals globally. Thus, women who are pregnant face unprecedented mental health challenges.

objectiveWe sought to determine the impact of the pandemic on perinatal depression and anxiety in a longitudinal pregnancy cohort. We hypothesized increased depression and anxiety scores in women during pregnancy and after birth in the pandemic at all time points. STUDY

designParticipants were enrolled in the Ontario Birth Study, a pregnancy cohort embedded in clinical care at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada. Perinatal depression and anxiety were assessed using the 2-Item Patient Health Questionnaire and 2-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire in early pregnancy, whereas the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and 2-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire were used in late pregnancy and after birth. Logistic regression models were created to examine the association of the pandemic with clinically elevated mental health scores in the prepandemic group vs pandemic group while adjusting for covariates.

resultsA total of 1159 survey responses from 649 participants between March 1, 2019, and February 28, 2021, were used to conduct this study. Participants were assessed in early pregnancy (n=416), in late pregnancy (n=373), and after birth (n=370). Responses received on or before February 29, 2020, were considered the "prepandemic" responses, whereas responses after the aforementioned date were considered the "pandemic" responses. Mean rank scores of depression and anxiety were significantly higher in the pandemic group (P=.02 and P=.003, respectively) in the postpartum period. There was no significant association between pandemic time and antenatal scores. However, postnatally, mothers were 2.6 times more likely to score ≥13 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during the pandemic than before the pandemic (95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.7; P=.02). Adjustment for ethnicity and income strengthened this association as the odds ratio increased to 3.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.4-8.0; P=.007).

conclusionPandemic-associated increases in depression and anxiety scores were confined to the postpartum period, highlighting a need for increased screening and interventions for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders postnatally as this pandemic continues.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionFemaleHumansOntarioPandemicsParturitionPregnancyanxietyCOVID-19 pandemicdepressiondevelopmental programmingEdinburgh Postnatal Depression ScaleGeneralized Anxiety Disorder QuestionnairePatient Health Questionnaireperinatal mental healthperinatal mood and anxiety disorderspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35257937
PMCPMC8895717
OpenAlexW4214808716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.