ArticleBiophysical journal2022
Facilitated dissociation of nucleoid-associated proteins from DNA in the bacterial confinement.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Macromolecular interactions and geometrical confinement determine the 3D diffusion of ribosome-sized particles in liveProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The mechanism of mRNA cap recognition.Nature · 2025Article
- Heterogeneous flexibility can contribute to chromatin segregation in the cell nucleus.Physical review. E · 2024Article
- Macromolecular interactions and geometrical confinement determine the 3D diffusion of ribosome-sized particles in livebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Integrative modeling of JCVI-Syn3A nucleoids with a modular approach.Current research in structural biology · 2024Article
- The mechanism of mRNA activation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcription machinery depends on the temporal formation of protein-DNA complexes. Recent experiments demonstrated that not only the formation but also the lifetime of such complexes can affect the transcriptional machinery. In parallel, in vitro single-molecule studies showed that nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) leave the DNA rapidly as the bulk concentration of the protein increases via facilitated dissociation (FD). Nevertheless, whether such a concentration-dependent mechanism is functional in a bacterial cell, in which NAP levels and the 3d chromosomal structure are often coupled, is not clear a priori. Here, by using extensive coarse-grained molecular simulations, we model the unbinding of specific and nonspecific dimeric NAPs from a high-molecular-weight circular DNA molecule in a cylindrical structure mimicking the cellular confinement of a bacterial chromosome. Our simulations confirm that physiologically relevant peak protein levels (tens of micromolar) lead to highly compact chromosomal structures. This compaction results in rapid off rates (shorter DNA residence times) for specifically DNA-binding NAPs, such as the factor for inversion stimulation, which mostly dissociate via a segmental jump mechanism. Contrarily, for nonspecific NAPs, which are more prone to leave their binding sites via 1d sliding, the off rates decrease as the protein levels increase. The simulations with restrained chromosome models reveal that chromosome compaction is in favor of faster dissociation but only for specific proteins, and nonspecific proteins are not affected by the chromosome compaction. Overall, our results suggest that the cellular concentration level of a structural DNA-binding protein can be highly intermingled with its DNA residence time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.