ReviewAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2021
The role of rotational thromboelastometry in understanding the coagulation problems in COVID-19 associated critical illness.
Review in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In critically ill patients with COVID-19, concomitant abnormalities of coagulation have been seen with an unusually high incidence, often despite seemingly appropriate prophylactic anti-coagulation. It appears that standard coagulation tests are limited in their ability to accurately reflect the severity of the prothrombotic phenotype observed in severe COVID-19 infections. In this narrative review we consider the role of a global haemostatic assay, rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), as a near bedside test allowing a more comprehensive assessment of haemostatic function in the context of COVID-19 infection. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed using the keywords "COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2" AND "Rotational thromboelastometry". Sixteen original articles were included for analysis and two existing literature reviews were considered. Whilst not the perfect substitute for in vivo coagulation, studies utilising rotational thromboelastometry assays in COVID-19 patients have demonstrated increased maximum clot firmness (consistent with hypercoagulability) and reduced maximum lysis (consistent with "fibrinolytic shutdown"). There is a possible association with disease severity and degree of hypercoagulability and hypofibrinolysis as a possible tool for risk stratification and the potential modulation of fibrinogen-dependent maximum clot firmness with enhanced anticoagulation strategies. Precisely how these coagulation abnormalities can be modified by optimum, individualised medical interventions to improve clinical outcomes, however, remains unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.