Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35257434›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

Duration of use and outcomes among people with opioid use disorder initiating methadone and buprenorphine in Ontario: a population-based propensity-score matched cohort study.

Tara Gomes, Daniel McCormack, Nikki Bozinoff, Mina Tadrous, Tony Antoniou, Charlotte Munro, Tonya Campbell, J Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani, Beth Sproule

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tara GomesLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1468-1965
Daniel McCormackICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nikki BozinoffCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mina TadrousLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tony AntoniouLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charlotte MunroOntario Drug Policy Research Network Lived Experience Advisory Group, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tonya CampbellLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Michael PatersonICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Muhammad MamdaniLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Beth SprouleLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo characterize comparative risks and benefits of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone in a contemporary cohort where the unregulated drug supply is dominated by fentanyl. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsPopulation-based propensity-score matched cohort study conducted in Ontario, Canada among people aged 18+ initiating opioid agonist therapy (OAT) for an opioid use disorder between October 2016 and December 2018 (n = 18 880).

interventionInitiation of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was opioid overdose (fatal and non-fatal) while on treatment, with secondary outcomes including opioid overdose (first 30 days of treatment), treatment discontinuation, health-care interactions related to treatment of opioid use disorder, receiving a weekly supply of take-home doses and opioid overdose within 30 days of treatment discontinuation. Outcomes were assessed over 1 year.

findingsOverall, 7517 people initiating buprenorphine were matched to an equal number of methadone-treated individuals. Risk of opioid overdose while on treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.37-0.68] or within the first 30 days of treatment (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.31-0.85) was lower among buprenorphine recipients compared to methadone recipients. In secondary analyses, people initiating buprenorphine had a higher risk of treatment discontinuation within the first year (median time to discontinuation 104 versus 265 days, HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.37-1.49), had lower rates of health-care interactions for OUD (186.4 versus 254.3 per person-year; rate ratio = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.72-0.75), and a higher rate of receiving weekly take-home doses (HR = 2.33; 95% CI = 2.20-2.46). Overdose rates in the period following OAT discontinuation were higher than those observed while on treatment, but did not differ significantly by OAT type.

conclusionsAlthough treatment retention is higher among methadone recipients, overdose risk is also elevated compared to buprenorphine recipients. These findings demonstrate the benefits of any OAT on avoidance of overdose, particularly following treatment discontinuation and with the increasingly unpredictable drug supply in North America.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineDrug OverdoseOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationCohort StudiesHumansMethadoneOntarioOpiate Substitution TreatmentAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationMethadoneDrug discontinuation | Health Services Research | opioid agonist therapyopioid use disorderoverdose | persistence

Identifiers

PMID35257434
PMCPMC9313829
OpenAlexW4220683880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.