ArticleMedical physics2022
INSIDEnet: Interpretable NonexpanSIve Data-Efficient network for denoising in grating interferometry breast CT.
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simultaneous signal optimization of refraction and attenuation in x-ray grating interferometry: A case study for breast imaging.Medical physics · 2025Article
- INSIDEnet: Interpretable NonexpanSIve Data-Efficient network for denoising in grating interferometry breast CT.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Iterative phase contrast CT reconstruction with novel tomographic operator and data-driven prior.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBreast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. Unfortunately, current breast imaging techniques all suffer from certain limitations: they are either not fully three dimensional, have an insufficient resolution or low soft-tissue contrast. Grating interferometry breast computed tomography (GI-BCT) is a promising X-ray phase contrast modality that could overcome these limitations by offering high soft-tissue contrast and excellent three-dimensional resolution. To enable the transition of this technology to clinical practice, dedicated data-processing algorithms must be developed in order to effectively retrieve the signals of interest from the measured raw data.
methodsThis article proposes a novel denoising algorithm that can cope with the high-noise amplitudes and heteroscedasticity which arise in GI-BCT when operated in a low-dose regime to effectively regularize the ill-conditioned GI-BCT inverse problem. We present a data-driven algorithm called INSIDEnet, which combines different ideas such as multiscale image processing, transform-domain filtering, transform learning, and explicit orthogonality to build an Interpretable NonexpanSIve Data-Efficient network (INSIDEnet).
resultsWe apply the method to simulated breast phantom datasets and to real data acquired on a GI-BCT prototype and show that the proposed algorithm outperforms traditional state-of-the-art filters and is competitive with deep neural networks. The strong inductive bias given by the proposed model's architecture allows to reliably train the algorithm with very limited data while providing high model interpretability, thus offering a great advantage over classical convolutional neural networks (CNNs).
conclusionsThe proposed INSIDEnet is highly data-efficient, interpretable, and outperforms state-of-the-art CNNs when trained on very limited training data. We expect the proposed method to become an important tool as part of a dedicated plug-and-play GI-BCT reconstruction framework, needed to translate this promising technology to the clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.