Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35257328›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2022

Opioids for Cesarean delivery under general anesthesia and neonatal outcome: a historical cohort study.

Natasha Caissie, Jennifer Héroux, Maxime Lefebvre, Daphnée Lamarche, Marie-Chantal Dubois, Geneviève Rivard, Frédérick D'Aragon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natasha CaissieDepartment of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Jennifer HérouxDepartment of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Maxime LefebvreDepartment of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Daphnée LamarcheDepartment of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Marie-Chantal DuboisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Geneviève RivardDepartment of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Frédérick D'AragonCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier, Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. frederick.daragon@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1323-0449
Université de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe lack of evidence-based recommendations for Cesarean delivery under general anesthesia can lead to practice variability and morbidity, particularly concerning the use of opioids. The goal of this study was to describe the practice for Cesarean delivery performed under general anesthesia and identify predictive factors for opioid use at anesthesia induction and the need for neonatal resuscitation.

methodsWe conducted a single-center historical cohort study. We included all adult parturients who underwent Cesarean delivery under general anesthesia between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016. We excluded patients who received general anesthesia after delivery or with known intrauterine fetal demise. We collected data on anesthetic medication use, maternal comorbidities, neonatal resuscitation, and anesthetic complications. We used logistic regression models to identify predictors of opioid use at anesthesia induction and predictors of neonatal resuscitation.

resultsTwo hundred and three patients were included. Propofol was the main induction agent (n = 195), 201 patients received neuromuscular blockers, and 67 received opioids. No maternal factors, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (odds ratio [OR], 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 3.95; P = 0.06), were predictors of opioid use at induction of anesthesia. No statistical differences were detected between opioid administration groups, except for Cesarean indication, with preeclampsia being the main contributor. Low gestational age (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.87; P = 0.002) was the only predictor of neonatal resuscitation.

conclusionHypertensive disorders of pregnancy were not predictors of opioid use and opioid use was not a predictor of neonatal resuscitation. This suggests opioids could be used for maternal indications.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedAdultAnesthesia, GeneralApgar ScoreCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyResuscitationRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidApgar scoreCesarean deliverygeneral anesthesiaopioids

Identifiers

PMID35257328
OpenAlexW4221061591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.