Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35257292›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022

Convolutional neural network-based automatic classification for incomplete antibody reaction intensity in solid phase anti-human globulin test image.

KeQing Wu, ShengBao Duan, YuJue Wang, HongMei Wang, Xin Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

KeQing WuSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
ShengBao DuanCAS Key Lab of Bio-Medical Diagnostics, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Suzhou, 215163, China.
YuJue WangCAS Key Lab of Bio-Medical Diagnostics, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Suzhou, 215163, China.
HongMei WangCAS Key Lab of Bio-Medical Diagnostics, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Suzhou, 215163, China. wanghm@sibet.ac.cn.
Xin GaoSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Suzhou, 215163, China. xingaosam@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9906-0596

Funding

Development Program of Guangdong Province 2019B010152001Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu BE2021663National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871439Research Fund of Jihua Laboratory X190171TD190Shandong Province Department of Science and Technology ZR2020QF019Special fund for high-tech industrialisation of science and technology cooperation between Jilin Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences 2020SYHZ0025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precise classification of incomplete antibody reaction intensity (IARI) in hydrogel chromatography medium high density medium solid-phase Coombs test is essential for haemolytic disease screening. However, an automatic and contactless method is required for accurate classification of IARI. Here, we present a deep ensemble learning model that integrates five different convolutional neural networks into a single model for IARI classification. A dataset, including 1628 IARI images and corresponding labels of IARI categories ((-), (1 +), (2 +), (3 +), and (4 +)), was used. We trained our model using 1302 IARIs and validated its performance using 326 IARIs. The proposed model achieved 100%, 99.4%, 99.4%, 100%, and 100% accuracies in the ( -), (1 +), (2 +), (3 +), and (4 +) categories, respectively. The results were compared with those of manual classification by immunologists (average accuracy: 99.8% vs. 88.3%, p < 0.01). Following model assistance, all three immunologists achieved increased accuracy (average accuracy: + 6.1%), with the average accuracy of junior immunologists maximum increasing by 11.3%. The time required for model classification was 0.094 s·image

Indexed as

GlobulinsNeural Networks, ComputerAutomationCoombs TestImage Processing, Computer-AssistedGlobulinsAntibodyBlood transfusionCoombs testNeural network

Identifiers

PMID35257292
PMCPMC8901095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.