ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022
Toward automated segmentation for acute ischemic stroke using non-contrast computed tomography.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance of Machine Learning for Tissue Outcome Prediction in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Noncontrast CT-based habitat analysis for differentiating hemorrhagic transformation from contrast extravasation after endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Fully automated quantification of net water uptake in acute ischemic stroke using only non-contrast CT imaging.European radiology · 2026Article
- Comparing deep learning stroke segmentation in NCCT, CTA, and CTP: Accuracy, domain transfer, and temporal sampling effect.Medical physics · 2026Article
- A Short Review on Advances in Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Ischemic Stroke.Galen medical journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNon-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is a first-line imaging technique for determining treatment options for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, its poor contrast and signal-to-noise ratio limit the diagnosis accuracy for radiologists, and automated AIS lesion segmentation using NCCT also remains a challenge. In this paper, we propose R2U-RNet, a novel model for AIS lesion segmentation using NCCT.
methodsWe used an in-house retrospective NCCT dataset with 261 AIS patients with manual lesion segmentation using follow-up diffusion-weighted images. R2U-RNet is based on an R2U-Net backbone with a novel residual refinement unit. Each input image contains two image channels from separate preprocessing procedures. The proposed model incorporates multiscale focal loss to mitigate the class imbalance problem and to leverage the importance of different levels of details. A proposed noisy-label training scheme is utilized to account for uncertainties in the manual annotations.
resultsThe proposed model outperformed several iconic segmentation models in AIS lesion segmentation using NCCT, and our ablation study demonstrated the efficacy of the proposed model. Statistical analysis of segmentation performance revealed significant effects of regional stroke occurrence and side of the stroke, suggesting the importance of region-specific information for automated segmentation, and the potential influence of the hemispheric difference in clinical data.
conclusionThis study demonstrated the potentials of R2U-RNet model for automated NCCT AIS lesion segmentation. The proposed model can serve as a tool for accelerating AIS diagnoses and improving the treatment quality of AIS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35257285What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.