Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35257248›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

The effects of mouthwashes in human gingiva epithelial progenitor (HGEPp) cells.

Zsófia Kőhidai, Angéla Takács, Eszter Lajkó, Zoltán Géczi, Éva Pállinger, Orsolya Láng, László Kőhidai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of Mouthwashes Delivered via Dental Unit Waterlines in Reducing Aerosolized Surrogate SARS-CoV-2.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Ingredients in Commercially Available Mouthwashes.International dental journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zsófia KőhidaiDepartment of Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. kohlasz2@gmail.com.
Angéla TakácsDepartment of Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Eszter LajkóDepartment of Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán GécziDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Éva PállingerDepartment of Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Orsolya LángDepartment of Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
László KőhidaiDepartment of Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9002-0296
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe gingiva epithelium accounts for a significant proportion of the surface around the tooth. An inflammatory reaction occurs in the presence of bacterial biofilm, adhesion is reduced, and the depth of the sulcus gingivalis increases. The most common antiseptic agents in oral rinses are chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) and cetylpyridinium chloride. We examined long-lasting effects of residual concentrations of eight commercially available rinses. Our main goals were (i) to analyze the effect of different chemical compositions on cell proliferation, (ii) to examine apoptosis, and (iii) cell morphology on human epithelial progenitor cell line (HGEPp). MATERIALS AND

methodsCell proliferation was measured in a real-time system (0-48 h) by impedimetry (xCELLigence). Apoptosis was measured with labeled Annexin-V (BD-FACScalibur).

resultsChanges in proliferation were measured at certain concentrations: (i) H

conclusionsMouthwashes and their reference compounds proved to have concentration-dependent cytotoxic effects on human gingival epithelial cells. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A better understanding of the effects of mouthwashes and their reference compounds is particularly important. These concentration-dependent effects (cytotoxic or proliferation inducing) interfere with human cells physiology while being used in the fight against the pathogenic flora.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalMouthwashesChlorhexidineGingivaHumansHydrogen PeroxideStem CellsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineHydrogen PeroxideMouthwashesChlorhexidineChlorine dioxideCytotoxicityHGEPpImpedimetryMouthwashes

Identifiers

PMID35257248
PMCPMC9203393
OpenAlexW4220844442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.