Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35257033›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022

A prospective, single-arm trial of fluorescent ureteroscopy-assisted thulium-holmium:YAG dual laser ablation for upper urinary tract cancer: Study protocol of the FLUAM trial.

Makito Miyake, Takashi Yoshida, Nobutaka Nishimura, Yuki Oda, Takuto Shimizu, Tomonori Nakahama, Shunta Hori, Yosuke Morizawa, Daisuke Gotoh, Yasushi Nakai and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Makito MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Takashi YoshidaDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan.
Nobutaka NishimuraDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Yuki OdaDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Takuto ShimizuDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Tomonori NakahamaDepartment of Urology, Hirao Hospital, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Shunta HoriDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Yosuke MorizawaDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Daisuke GotohDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Yasushi NakaiDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Satoshi AnaiDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Kazumasa TorimotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Tomomi FujiiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Nobumichi TanakaDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Kiyohide FujimotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Nara Medical University · JPKansai Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Latest guidelines recommend kidney-sparing management as the primary treatment option for selected patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). One of the biggest issues of ureteroscopic laser ablation (ULA) is a high rate of surgical site recurrence, which is largely attributed to residual lesions at the initial ULA. Another clinical issue is a significant lack of non-invasive reliable detection tools of urinary recurrent tumors in this treatment setting. Methods: The FLUAM trial is a prospective, single-center, single-arm pilot trial to investigate the efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic diagnosis (ALA-PDD)-assisted ULA for localized UTUC and the usefulness of the UroVysion® assay (multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization) as a monitoring test after the kidney-sparing treatment. After the screening and registration, a total of 20 patients with localized UTUC will undergo the initial ALA-PDD-assisted ULA followed by the second look ALA-PDD-assisted ureteroscopic examination. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include patient reported outcomes, diagnostic accuracy of UroVysion assay to detect tumor recurrence, adverse events, and safety of the intervention. Conclusion: The goal of this trial is to determine the potential benefit of ALA-PDD assistance in patients who undergo the ULA. The evidence of this novel technique is still limited. The results are expected to change the standard of care and lead to better management of localized UTUC. Trial registration: This clinical trial was prospectively registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on 23 June 2021. The reference number is jRCTs051210042, nara0023 (Certified Review Board of Nara Medical University).

Indexed as

5-Aminolevulinic acidPhotodynamic diagnosisTransurethral surgeryUpper urinary tract cancerUroVysion

Identifiers

PMID35257033
PMCPMC8897668
OpenAlexW4214863796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.