Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35256929›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Longitudinal transition outcomes among adult dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes with the intention to quit in the United States: PATH Study (2013-2018).

Olatokunbo Osibogun, Zoran Bursac, Wasim Maziak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Electronic Cigarette Harms: Aggregate Evidence Shows Damage to Biological Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olatokunbo OsibogunDepartment of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Zoran BursacDepartment of Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Wasim MaziakDepartment of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.

Funding

The FIU Research Center in a Minority Institution (FIU-RCMI)U54MD012393 · NIMHD · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Shanna L Burke · 2017 to 2026
$32.1M
Translating evidence and building capacity to support waterpipe control in the Eastern MediterraneanR01TW010654 · FIC · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI ASFAR, TAGHRID, MAZIAK, WASIM · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Training Program in Adolescent Substance Use Disorders and Co-Occurring Mental and Behavioral DisordersT32DA043449 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Raul Gonzalez · 2019 to 2026
$1.7M
Advancing addiction research and capacity to guide tobacco control in the EasternR01DA035160 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI MAZIAK, WASIM · 2012 to 2017
$1.5M
Understanding tobacco flavor effects on waterpipe smokers’ experiences and exposuresR01DA042477 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI MAZIAK, WASIM · 2016 to 2018
$1.3M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010654NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035160NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042477NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA043449NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many adult dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes in the United States report using e-cigarettes with the intention to quit (ITQ) smoking. This study examined transition outcomes among adult dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes with the ITQ compared to mono cigarette smokers with ITQ. We conducted a longitudinal analysis of 3,542 adults aged ≥ 18 years with data from Waves 1 and 4 of the United States Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study (2013-2018) between May 2021 and January 2022. Current dual users (e-cigarettes and cigarettes use on ≥ 20 days in the past month) with the ITQ were compared to current mono cigarette smokers with the ITQ for transition outcomes (cessation, mono e-cigarette, mono cigarette and dual use) three years later. We conducted multinomial logistic regression modeling adjusting for potential confounders and reported the adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the transition outcomes. Approximately 10.7% (7.8-14.3) of dual users with the ITQ (in 2013) reported cessation (no past-month use of any tobacco) three years later, compared to 16.1% (14.6-17.7) of mono cigarette smokers. Dual users were 83% and 79% less likely to transition to cessation (aRRR: 0.17, 95% CI:0.09-0.32) or mono cigarette use (0.21, 0.14-0.32), respectively, compared to mono cigarette smokers. Our findings show that in a real-world scenario, dual e-cigarette and cigarette use may hinder rather than facilitate smoking cessation among those interested in quitting. This needs consideration when assessing the population impact of e-cigarettes and their role in harm reduction.

Indexed as

BRR, Balanced repeated replicationE-cigarettesHarm reductionIntention to quitITQ, Intention to quitLongitudinalPATH, Population Assessment of Tobacco and HealthTobacco

Identifiers

PMID35256929
PMCPMC8897625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.