ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022
Experiences and preferences towards collecting a urine and cervicovaginal self-sample among women attending a colposcopy clinic.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discovery and analytical assessment of urinary miRNA biomarkers for cervical cancer using advanced small RNA sequencing.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Detection of recurrent endometrial cancer via DNA methylation analysis of cervicovaginal self-samples and urine.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Performance of a novel, urine-based test for the detection of cervical human papillomavirus infection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Metabolic comparison of minimally to noninvasive urogenital sample types for studying gynecologic health: A pilot study.iScience · 2025Article
- Unlocking the potential of tumor-derived DNA in urine for cancer detection: methodological challenges and opportunities.Molecular oncology · 2025Review
- Recurrent cervical cancer detection using DNA methylation markers in self-collected samples from home.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Molecular analysis for ovarian cancer detection in patient-friendly samples.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Extracellular urinary microRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers of endometrial and ovarian cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Article
- Evaluation of Urine and Vaginal Self-Sampling versus Clinician-Based Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Field Comparison of the Acceptability of Three Sampling Tests in a Rural Community of Cuenca, Ecuador.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Are we ready for human papillomavirus testing? Assessment of patient knowledge of and preferences for cervical cancer screening in Ontario.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadienArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness of cervical cancer screening is hampered by low attendance rates. The collection of a urine sample is hypothesized to engage non-attenders in cervical cancer screening. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate experiences of women on urine collection and cervicovaginal self-sampling in a home-based setting and preferences for future cervical cancer screening. This study included 140 women, with a median age of 40 years, who were planned for a large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) procedure. All women collected a urine sample using conventional urine cups and a cervicovaginal self-sample prior to the LLETZ in a home-based setting. Following sample collection, women filled in a questionnaire. Results showed that the instructions of urine collection and cervicovaginal self-sampling were considered clear (95%, 95%CI: 88-98; 92%, 95%CI: 83-96, respectively). Women considered urine collection compared to cervicovaginal self-sampling to be more acceptable (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.