ArticleCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology2022
Renal Tumors in Pregnancy: A Case Report Focusing on the Timing of the Surgery and Patient Positioning.
Article in Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic Surgery in the Management of Renal Tumors During Pregnancy: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of renal mass during pregnancy is challenging. There is no consensus regarding the fundamental timing issues (which trimester) of the interventions and patient positioning during the procedures. We present three pregnant women with renal mass and their management, focusing on patient positioning and timing of surgical intervention. All patients were positioned supine with a 30-degree rotation to the left lateral without signs of compromising fetal circulation. This report's three major takeaway points are the following: (1) Renal mass biopsy might be more beneficial in pregnant women than the normal population (unless CT findings suggest vascular angiomyolipomas) to achieve a definite diagnosis and avoid unnecessary interventions during pregnancy. (2) Surgical interventions, if indicated, should be performed as soon as possible and are applicable in all trimesters of pregnancy. (3) A minimum of 15-degree left lateral tilt (for both right- and left-sided renal masses) can provide enough venous return during the nephrectomy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.