Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35256855›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022

Artificial Intelligence-Based Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Ultrasound Images and Grid-Based Deep Feature Generator.

Haixia Liu, Guozhong Cui, Yi Luo, Yajie Guo, Lianli Zhao, Yueheng Wang, Abdulhamit Subasi, Sengul Dogan, Turker Tuncer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Deep Learning for Describing Breast Ultrasound Images with BI-RADS Terms.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Artificial intelligence in breast cancer: application and future perspectives.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haixia LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, 061000, People's Republic of China.
Guozhong CuiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, 061000, People's Republic of China.
Yi LuoMedical Statistics Room, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, 061000, People's Republic of China.
Yajie GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, 061000, People's Republic of China.
Lianli ZhaoDepartment of Internal Medicine teaching and research group, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, 061000, China.
Yueheng WangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Hospital of Hebei MedicalUniversity, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Abdulhamit SubasiInstitute of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, 20520, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7630-4084
Sengul DoganDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey.
Turker TuncerDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer is a prominent cancer type with high mortality. Early detection of breast cancer could serve to improve clinical outcomes. Ultrasonography is a digital imaging technique used to differentiate benign and malignant tumors. Several artificial intelligence techniques have been suggested in the literature for breast cancer detection using breast ultrasonography (BUS). Nowadays, particularly deep learning methods have been applied to biomedical images to achieve high classification performances. Patients and Methods: This work presents a new deep feature generation technique for breast cancer detection using BUS images. The widely known 16 pre-trained CNN models have been used in this framework as feature generators. In the feature generation phase, the used input image is divided into rows and columns, and these deep feature generators (pre-trained models) have applied to each row and column. Therefore, this method is called a grid-based deep feature generator. The proposed grid-based deep feature generator can calculate the error value of each deep feature generator, and then it selects the best three feature vectors as a final feature vector. In the feature selection phase, iterative neighborhood component analysis (INCA) chooses 980 features as an optimal number of features. Finally, these features are classified by using a deep neural network (DNN). Results: The developed grid-based deep feature generation-based image classification model reached 97.18% classification accuracy on the ultrasonic images for three classes, namely malignant, benign, and normal. Conclusion: The findings obviously denoted that the proposed grid deep feature generator and INCA-based feature selection model successfully classified breast ultrasonic images.

Indexed as

breast ultrasonography (BUS)deep classification frameworkdeep neural networkgrid-based deep feature generatoriterative feature selection

Identifiers

PMID35256855
PMCPMC8898057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.