Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35256847›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2022

Adherence to Diabetes Self-Management and Its Associated Factors Among Adolescents Living with Type 1 Diabetes at Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Yomilan Geneti, Kalkidan Wondwossen, Mekonen Adimasu, Dereje Deressa, Fekadu Aga, Magarsa Lami, Lemesa Abdisa, Seboka Abebe, Hirut Dinku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yomilan GenetiDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Dire Dawa University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-9249-0283
Kalkidan WondwossenDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mekonen AdimasuDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-8878-0122
Dereje DeressaDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Fekadu AgaDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-2230-7153
Magarsa LamiDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-2871-9450
Lemesa AbdisaDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-1025
Seboka AbebeDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-3761-6007
Hirut DinkuDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-1438-8125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the level of adherence to diabetes self-management and associated factors among adolescents living with type 1 diabetes at Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was carried out among 422 adolescents with type 1 diabetes attending outpatient diabetic clinics at public hospitals in Addis Ababa. The adolescents were interviewed using pretested questionnaires to give information on adherence to diabetes self-management. A variable that has a P-value of <0.2 in bi-variable logistic regression analysis was subjected to multivariable logistic regression analysis to control the confounding factors. The level of significance was pronounced at P-value <0.05. Results: In this study, a total of 414 adolescents living with type 1 diabetes were interviewed making a 98.1% response rate. About 218 participants (52.7%) had poor adherence to overall diabetes self-management. Self-efficacy (AOR=8.7, 95% CI:1.9-14.1, P=0.005), social support (AOR=4.6, 95% CI:1.5-13.5, P=0.006), age (AOR=0.2, 95% CI:0.1-0.4, P=0.001), good knowledge of the disease (AOR=9.046, 95% CI:3.83-13.5, P=0.000), moderate knowledge (AOR=6.763, 95% CI:2.18-12.921, P=0.001), and time since diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (AOR=0.1, 95% CI:0.02-0.2, P=0.005) were significantly associated with adherence to diabetes self-management. Conclusions and Recommendations: More than half of this population had poor adherence to diabetes self-management. The finding suggested that implementing a comprehensive guideline of adherence and expanding the recurrence of follow-up visits could be important for this population.

Indexed as

adherenceadolescentsADSMdiabetesself-management

Identifiers

PMID35256847
PMCPMC8898021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.