Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35256818›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2022

Functions and consequences of AID/APOBEC-mediated DNA and RNA deamination.

Riccardo Pecori, Salvatore Di Giorgio, J Paulo Lorenzo, F Nina Papavasiliou

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 157 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
37.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 253 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  4. Engineered Transformer Base Editor with Enhanced Editing Efficiency.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Two codes of RNA editing by deamination in human diseases.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026
    Review

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Riccardo PecoriDivision of Immune Diversity (D150), Program in Cancer Immunology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9052-4075
Salvatore Di GiorgioDivision of Immune Diversity (D150), Program in Cancer Immunology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-717X
J Paulo LorenzoDivision of Immune Diversity (D150), Program in Cancer Immunology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
F Nina PapavasiliouDivision of Immune Diversity (D150), Program in Cancer Immunology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. n.papavasiliou@dkfz-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5971-7909
German Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The AID/APOBEC polynucleotide cytidine deaminases have historically been classified as either DNA mutators or RNA editors based on their first identified nucleic acid substrate preference. DNA mutators can generate functional diversity at antibody genes but also cause genomic instability in cancer. RNA editors can generate informational diversity in the transcriptome of innate immune cells, and of cancer cells. Members of both classes can act as antiviral restriction factors. Recent structural work has illuminated differences and similarities between AID/APOBEC enzymes that can catalyse DNA mutation, RNA editing or both, suggesting that the strict functional classification of members of this family should be reconsidered. As many of these enzymes have been employed for targeted genome (or transcriptome) editing, a more holistic understanding will help improve the design of therapeutically relevant programmable base editors.

Indexed as

Cytidine DeaminaseRNADeaminationDNARNA EditingCytidine DeaminaseDNARNA

Identifiers

PMID35256818
PMCPMC8900473
OpenAlexW4220959602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.