Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35256754›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2022

The impact of oophorectomy on survival from breast cancer in patients with CHEK2 mutations.

Joanna Tomiczek-Szwiec, Marek Szwiec, Michal Falco, Cezary Cybulski, Dominika Wokolorczyk, Anna Jakubowska, Jacek Gronwald, Malgorzata Stawicka, Dariusz Godlewski, Ewa Kilar and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. TheGenes · 2023
    Article
  6. Genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer in Poland: 1998-2022.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanna Tomiczek-SzwiecDepartment of Histology, Department of Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.
Marek SzwiecDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28 St, 65-046, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Michal FalcoRegional Oncology Hospital, Strzalowska 22, 71-730, Szczecin, Poland.
Cezary CybulskiDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1 St, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland.
Dominika WokolorczykDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1 St, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland.
Anna JakubowskaDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1 St, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-0501
Jacek GronwaldDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1 St, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland.
Malgorzata StawickaDepartment of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28 St, 65-046, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Dariusz GodlewskiOPEN, Kazimierza Wielkiego 24 St, 61-863, Poznań, Poland.
Ewa KilarDepartment of Oncology, District Specialist Hospital, Leśna 27-29 St, 58-100, Świdnica, Poland.
Elzbieta MarczykDepartment of Oncological Surgery, Regional Oncology Center, Gancarska 11 St, 31-115, Kraków, Poland.
Monika SiołekHolycross Cancer Center, Artwińskiego 3 St, 25-734, Kielce, Poland.
Rafal WiśniowskiRegional Oncology Hospital, Wyzwolenia 18 St, 43-300, Bielsko Biała, Poland.
Olga HausDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Jagiellońska 13 St, 85-067, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Robert SibilskiDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28 St, 65-046, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Lubomir BodnarDepartment of Oncology and Immuno-oncology, School of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Uniwersity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Warszawska 30 St, 10-082, Olsztyn, Poland.
Ping SunWomen's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2, Canada.
Steven A NarodWomen's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2, Canada. steven.narod@wchospital.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5798-0626
Jan LubinskiDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1 St, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland.
Tomasz HuzarskiDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1 St, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland.
Polish Breast Cancer Consortium
Lublin Oncology Center · PLInternational Hereditary Cancer Center · PLGreater Poland Cancer Center · PLUniversity of Zielona Góra · PLPomeranian Medical University · PLThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLWojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej · PLWomen's College Hospital · CAFree and Open Source Software Foundation · PLHoly Cross University · PLMedical University of Lodz · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Computer Sciences and Economics in Olsztyn · PLUniversity of Opole · PLUniversity of Rzeszów · PLUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo estimate the impact of oophorectomy and other treatments on the survival of breast cancer patients with a CHEK2 mutation.

methodsWomen with Stage I-III breast cancer who were treated at 17 hospitals in Poland were tested for four founder mutations in the CHEK2 gene. 974 women (10%) were positive for a CHEK2 mutation. Control patients without a CHEK2 mutation were selected from a database of patients treated over the same time period. Information on treatments received and distant recurrences were retrieved from medical records. Treatments included chemotherapy, hormonal therapy (tamoxifen) and radiation therapy. Oophorectomies were performed for the treatment of breast cancer or for benign conditions. Dates of death were obtained from the Polish Vital Statistics Registry. Causes of death were determined by medical record review. Predictors of survival were determined using the Cox proportional hazards model.

resultsIn all, 839 patients with a CHEK2 mutation were matched to 839 patients without a mutation. The mean follow-up was 12.0 years. The 15-year survival for CHEK2 carriers was 76.6% and the 15-year survival for non-carrier control patients was 78.8% (adjusted HR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.84-1.34; P = 0.61). Among CHEK2 carriers, the 15-year survival for women who had an oophorectomy was 86.3% and for women who did not have an oophorectomy was 72.1% (adjusted HR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38-0.90; P = 0.02). Among controls, the 15-year survival for patients who had an oophorectomy was 84.5% and for women who did not have an oophorectomy was 77.6% (adjusted HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.66-1.61; P = 0.90).

conclusionAmong women with breast cancer and a CHEK2 mutation, oophorectomy is associated with a reduced risk of death from breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCheckpoint Kinase 2OvariectomyFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMutationProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID35256754
PMCPMC9276789
OpenAlexW4220831994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.