Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35256740›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Simulated visual hallucinations in virtual reality enhance cognitive flexibility.

Clara Rastelli, Antonino Greco, Yoed N Kenett, Chiara Finocchiaro, Nicola De Pisapia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clara Rastelli *Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, 38068, Rovereto, Italy. clara.rastelli@unitn.it.
Antonino Greco *MEG Center, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. antonino.greco@uni-tuebingen.de.
Yoed N KenettFaculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, 3200003, Haifa, Israel.
Chiara FinocchiaroDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, 38068, Rovereto, Italy.
Nicola De PisapiaDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, 38068, Rovereto, Italy. nicola.depisapia@unitn.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, psychedelic drugs are known to modulate cognitive flexibility, a central aspect of cognition permitting adaptation to changing environmental demands. Despite proof suggesting phenomenological similarities between artificially-induced and actual psychedelic altered perception, experimental evidence is still lacking about whether the former is also able to modulate cognitive flexibility. To address this, we measure participants' cognitive flexibility through behavioral tasks after the exposure to virtual reality panoramic videos and their hallucinatory-like counterparts generated by the DeepDream algorithm. Results show that the estimated semantic network has a flexible structure when preceded by altered videos. Crucially, following the simulated psychedelic exposure, individuals also show an attenuated contribution of the automatic process and chaotic dynamics underlying the decision process. This suggests that simulated altered perceptual phenomenology enhances cognitive flexibility, presumably due to a reorganization in the cognitive dynamics that facilitates the exploration of uncommon decision strategies and inhibits automated choices.

Indexed as

HallucinogensVirtual RealityAdaptation, PhysiologicalCognitionHallucinationsHumansHallucinogens

Identifiers

PMID35256740
PMCPMC8901713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.