Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35256726›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Unexpected malocclusion in a 13,000-Year-old Late Pleistocene young woman from Mexico.

José Rubén Herrera-Atoche, James C Chatters, Andrea Cucina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José Rubén Herrera-AtocheDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Autonomous University of Yucatan, Calle 61-A No. 492-A Costado Sur del Parque de la Paz por Avenida Itzáes, Col. Centro, 97000, Mérida, Yucatán, México. jose.herrera@correo.uady.mx.
James C ChattersApplied PaleoScience, Washington, USA.
Andrea CucinaSchool of Anthropological Sciences, Autonomous University of Yucatan, Carretera Merida-Tizimin, Tramo Cholul, 97305, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico. cucina@correo.uady.mx.
Autonomous University of Yucatán · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyze the etiological factors behind the malocclusion of a Late Pleistocene woman (named Naia), who is the best-preserved of the earliest individuals of the American continent. The examination of Naia's malocclusion was performed through cephalometric and occlusal analyses, and by measuring her mandible. Her data were then compared to published data for modern, medieval, and postmedieval samples and seven Late Pleistocene individuals. Naia presented her permanent dentition fully erupted, except for the impacted mandibular third molars. She presented a class II molar malocclusion with crowding. The dental widths and mandible measurements were similar to or smaller than modern standards. The degree of dental wear was light. The cephalometric analysis confirmed a skeletal class II relationship, with a retrusive mandible and protruded upper incisors. Naia's mild level of dental wear is consistent with a low masticatory force, in a time when the norm was a high amount of grinding. The low masticatory forces help explain Naia's small jaws and crowding. However, it does not clarify Angle's class II relationship. Naia is an example that environmental factors are insufficient to explain the onset of malocclusions and emphasizes the importance of understanding hereditary factors' role.

Indexed as

MalocclusionMalocclusion, Angle Class IITooth WearCephalometryFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMandibleMexico

Identifiers

PMID35256726
PMCPMC8901630
OpenAlexW4221014379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.