ArticleScientific reports2022
Customized 3D-printed stackable cell culture inserts tailored with bioactive membranes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review of the wide applications of microfluidic devices in peri-implantitis, periodontitis, and endodontics.Odontology · 2026Review
- In vitro approaches for modelling gut-liver crosstalk in drug-induced liver injury.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
- A multidimensional platform to support intestinal epithelial and immune cell co-culture.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Augmented 3D Printing for Multiscale Microphysiological Systems.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- An In Vitro Cell Model of Intestinal Barrier Function Using a Low-Cost 3D-Printed Transwell Device and Paper-Based Cell Membrane.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Nuclear enlargement after confined migration in cancer cells.microPublication biology · 2025Article
- An In Vitro Model of the Blood-Brain Barrier for the Investigation and Isolation of the Key Drivers of Barriergenesis.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- A customizable and low-cost 3D-printed transwell device coupled with 3D cell culture for permeability assay.HardwareX · 2024Article
- Development of an intestinal mucosaJournal of virology · 2024Article
- Microfluidic Gastrointestinal Cell Culture Technologies-Improvements in the Past Decade.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Review
- Technology platform for facile handling of 3D hydrogel cell culture scaffolds.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Potential Clinical Application of Organs-on-a-Chip in Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.Dentistry journal · 2023Review
- 3D-Printed Microfluidic Chip for Real-Time Glucose Monitoring in Liquid Analytes.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Engineered-Skin of Single Dermal Layer Containing Printed Hybrid Gelatin-Polyvinyl Alcohol Bioink via 3D-Bioprinting: In Vitro Assessment under Submerged vs. Air-Lifting Models.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is a high demand in various fields to develop complex cell cultures. Apart from titer plates, Transwell inserts are the most popular device because they are commercially available, easy to use, and versatile. While Transwell inserts are standardized, there are potential gains to customize inserts in terms of the number of layers, height between the layers and the size and composition of the bioactive membrane. To demonstrate such customization, we present a small library of 3D-printed inserts and a robust method to functionalize the inserts with hydrogel and synthetic membrane materials. The library consists of 24- to 96-well sized inserts as whole plates, strips, and singlets. The density of cultures (the number of wells per plate) and the number of layers was decided by the wall thickness, the capillary forces between the layers and the ability to support fluid operations. The highest density for a two-layer culture was 48-well plate format because the corresponding 96-well format could not support fluidic operations. The bottom apertures were functionalized with hydrogels using a new high-throughput dip-casting technique. This yielded well-defined hydrogel membranes in the apertures with a thickness of about 500 µm and a %CV (coefficient of variance) of < 10%. Consistent intestine barrier was formed on the gelatin over 3-weeks period. Furthermore, mouse intestinal organoid development was compared on hydrogel and synthetic filters glued to the bottom of the 3D-printed inserts. Condensation was most pronounced in inserts with filters followed by the gelatin membrane and the control, which were organoids cultured at the bottom of a titer plate well. This showed that the bottom of an insert should be chosen based on the application. All the inserts were fabricated using an easy-to-use stereolithography (SLA) printer commonly used for dentistry and surgical applications. Therefore, on demand printing of the customized inserts is realistic in many laboratory settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.