ArticleScientific reports2022
Characteristics of recurrent cases after conservative therapy in adolescent lumbar spondylolysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Occasionally lumbar spondylolysis in adolescents will recur after conservative treatment. The goal of this study was to retrospectively review the conditions in which recurrence transpired in a subset of adolescent patients diagnosed with acute lumbar spondylolysis. A retrospective survey was conducted in 141 patients who had been treated for spondylolysis and had obtained bone union. Twenty subjects were selected who had recurrent lumbar spondylolysis after returning to sports activity following the initial spondylolysis treatment. There were 18 males and two females with an average age at the time of initial visit of 13.3 years and 14.1 years at the time of recurrence. The average period of initial treatment was 101 days, and the average time to recurrence after healing was 149 days. There were three cases at L3, two cases at L4 and 15 cases at L5. At recurrence, 18 patients had unilateral involvement and two patients presented with bilateral occurrence. Four cases did not achieve bony union. In this study, the recurrence rate was 13.2%. Eighty percent of cases had recurrence within six months after healing. After recurrence, 20% of the cases reached pseudoarthrosis. It is useful to take regular MRI images to detect recurrence within six months after returning to sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.