Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35256660›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A retrospective cohort study of 238,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths in Brazil.

Marcos Felipe Falcão Sobral, Antonio Roazzi, Ana Iza Gomes da Penha Sobral, Brigitte Renata Bezerra de Oliveira, Gisleia Benini Duarte, Jadson Freire da Silva, Renata Maria Toscano Barreto Lyra Nogueira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcos Felipe Falcão SobralPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Administração e Desenvolvimento, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Avenida Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n - Dois Irmãos, Recife, PE, Brazil. marcos.sobral@ufrpe.br.
Antonio RoazziPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Cognitiva, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235 - Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Ana Iza Gomes da Penha SobralPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Cognitiva, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235 - Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Brigitte Renata Bezerra de OliveiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Administração e Desenvolvimento, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Avenida Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n - Dois Irmãos, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Gisleia Benini DuartePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Administração e Desenvolvimento, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Avenida Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n - Dois Irmãos, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Jadson Freire da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235 - Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Renata Maria Toscano Barreto Lyra NogueiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Cognitiva, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235 - Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has overwhelmed health care systems in many countries and bed availability has become a concern. In this context, the present study aimed to analyze the hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) times in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The study covered 55,563 ICU admissions and 238,075 hospitalizations in Brazilian Health System units from February 22, 2020, to June 7, 2021. All the patients had a positive COVID-19 diagnosis. The symptoms analyzed included: fever, dyspnea, low oxygen saturation (SpO2 < 95%), cough, respiratory distress, fatigue, sore throat, diarrhea, vomiting, loss of taste, loss of smell, and abdominal pain. We performed Cox regression in two models (ICU and hospitalization times). Hazard ratios (HRs) and survival curves were calculated by age group. The average stay was 14.4 days for hospitalized patients and 12.4 days for ICU patients. For hospitalized cases, the highest hazard mean values, with a positive correlation, were for symptoms of dyspnea (HR = 1.249; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.225-1.273) and low oxygen saturation (HR = 1.157; 95% CI 1.137-1.178). In the ICU, the highest hazard mean values were for respiratory discomfort (HR = 1.194; 95% CI 1.161-1.227) and abdominal pain (HR = 1.100; 95% CI 1.047-1.156). Survival decreased by an average of 2.27% per day for hospitalization and 3.27% per day for ICU stay. Survival by age group curves indicated that younger patients were more resistant to prolonged hospital stay than older patients. Hospitalization was also lower in younger patients. The mortality rate was higher in males than females. Symptoms related to the respiratory tract were associated with longer hospital stay. This is the first study carried out with a sample of 238,000 COVID-19 positive participants, covering the main symptoms and evaluating the hospitalization and ICU times.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care UnitsLength of Stay

Identifiers

PMID35256660
PMCPMC8901772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.